Recent comments in /f/BuyItForLife

iamkris t1_j3q5ca4 wrote

i mainly have Le Creuset for my day to day. i have an okay ish 11 litre stock pot with a reasonably thick base for big batch stuff and a non stick frypan for when i want to make scrambled eggs.

the Le Creuset stuff ive had for 10+ years and they arent really showing any signs of wear.

Half of my Le Creuset stuff ive bought second hand or factory seconds and they are fine.

My next purchase is going to be an all clad stock pot because i want to be able to make 2 batches of stuff at the same time to cut down on my cooking a bit.

2

xSympl OP t1_j3q4lei wrote

Ok, I'll sub haha

It's just really annoying when this sub had a lot of like, good brands to buy from (Solovair, Red Wings for a while, Pendleton, Patagonia, etc,.) and featured more the "overly-engineered" products, less the "my XYZ has been around since 1795, look!" Posts.

I appreciate a better place, still love this place but after coming back a few years later... Oof.

38

xSympl OP t1_j3q4axw wrote

Lol '"those" kind of people' makes absolutely zero sense outside of an argumentative context. What could that POSSIBLY infer, especially for a rather common and documented phenomenon that's been a phrase for a while.

Seems like you're in here being angry just to be angry, you good?

15

karaokekwien t1_j3q348d wrote

This is good advice. Also keep in mind that lower quality cookware that suitable for induction might not work if previously used on another heat source. It only takes a little bit of warping for the pan not to make enough contact with the induction stovetop, rendering it useless. The thicker the bottom, the more likely it will retain its shape and survive a transition to induction.

I am getting an induction stovetop this spring and am so curious to see how much of my cookware survives. I am hopeful for my Fissler Profi pots, but I am already mentally preparing myself to have to replace something inevitably because of the switch. Fingers crossed!!

2

PuzzleheadedLow4687 t1_j3q20rr wrote

It's the same argument that goes "the Victorians built all their buildings to look really pretty and last 200 years". No, they built some of their buildings that way. All the crappy and ugly Victorian buildings have long since fallen down or been demolished.

27

BuddingFarmer t1_j3q1joo wrote

Imagine a company made 5000 cast iron pans. In that 5000,many had flaws but a few were near perfect and didn't break over the next 100 years. Only 5 of them still exist unbroken, but no one thinks about the broken ones. So when someone shows off their 100 year old pan, they say that new stuff isn't made to last 100 years anymore. However the truth is that 99.9% of those pans weren't made to last 100 years, they just got lucky with the one that survived.

That's survivorship bias.

35

[deleted] t1_j3q0e4y wrote

Years ago when Digg came over, tbh. Read the sidebar. I think the mission statement may cover it, but so many people here just use the sub to recommend brands they kinda like rather than limiting the sub to items that are truly designed for a lifetime of ownership.

I can't even begin to talk about how a lifetime guarantee doesn't have anything to do with the idea behind wanting a buy it for life item. It's a cheat code around the concept that reeks of wasteful consumerism and true product value.

88