Recent comments in /f/BuyItForLife

ElectricGeometry t1_jcc4jq0 wrote

Honestly I think a lot comes down to understanding materials and some logic.

Natural materials tend to be desirable and can be combined and even bolstered with synthetics to make a nice blend. 98% cotton with 2% spandex for women's denim that has to stretch more? That's reasonable. But 12%? Adding in some random 15% polyester? That sounds like a combo that is trying to save money by cutting down on higher cost materials... Already a red flag.

As for logic, I have to ask myself, is the product I am holding trying to take advantage of a trend by "duping" an existing product? Like a thick fuzzy sock that gives the impression of a thick merino wool sock but is actually pure synthetics? I'm not trying to get down on synthetics here, they have their place, but it helps to ask-- what are they trying to lure me in with?

I know there is a lot we don't know... One company's bottom of the barrel cotton against beautiful long staple cotton are both still just going to be "100% cotton" on a label, but taking the time to look at a product in detail can help a lot.

1

deloreanafterdark t1_jcc24ju wrote

Interesting. I've been pretty disappointed in the material quality of Duluth, and I absolutely love my filson laptop bag that's been thrown in and out of a work truck and brought into job sites for 4yrs or so. Looks brand new if you dust it off. Only had clothing from Duluth, is their bag quality significantly higher than clothing?

0