Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

bobupvotes t1_j5nass3 wrote

Pricing is often a race to the bottom. If you’re pricing someone out, another company will gladly undercut you and make the sale. Fact that all companies are practicing this likely means they have some data supporting a difference between breeds but aren’t comfortable coming out and saying there’s a definitive difference.

2

B6304T4 t1_j5n9cp9 wrote

Aim for the leg gets you attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and a lawsuit. Unfortunately the way things go, you're better off taking the risk on a murder/manslaughter charge. Gangs send messages, using violence to prove a point is never a good approach. Dead people have a really hard time reoffending.

0

Prudent-Ball2698 t1_j5n8iau wrote

If it were Afghanistan when I were there I'd have emptied my clip first asked questions after, and yes I have had to do that, do I regret it? Yes, but what could've happened n what did happen are 2 different things. I thank whatever God there is I'm still here bc I acted first when I saw a threat.

−4

TheOtherMark t1_j5n4nks wrote

> idc I'm firing first at the perpetrators then asking later

Always know your target and what is beyond your target.

> not to kill

Never point a gun at anyone you don't intend to kill.

> THE constitution state

[Our namesake has nothing to do with the US Constitution.] (https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/ct03.asp)

> have the same law as Texas.

This Texas?

8

BobbyRobertson t1_j5n3o0a wrote

Thanks for the insight!

I understand it doesn't mean it's proof there's no difference between the two situations, but I feel insurance companies should have to show their work to treat people differently. It feels like it'd be too easy for them to overestimate their risk and lock classes of people out of the market. But obviously I'm not in the industry, I'm just skeptical

2