Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j5zfbcw wrote

We have them. Every so many years, the term is limited by having to be reelected with popular support.

If someone is popular and gets elected what's the issue?

I prefer the wisdom of experienced people than some arbitrary feel good term limits.

2

Blicero1 t1_j5zcnj7 wrote

Term limits sound so good, but in practice they've been quite bad. Missouri tried them and all they've done in let the bureaucrats and lobbyists run the show. If you're out in eight years you're already looking for your next job, so you'll cozy up to industry.

10

Taurothar t1_j5za2la wrote

I agree with reasonable term limits, but cycling new people that them too easily abused by lobbyists who know the system better than newbies. Career politicians at all levels have value in safeguarding the processes.

That said, nobody should stay at the same level for more than 8-12 years. Move up or move out.

4

TreeEleben t1_j5z7cxk wrote

The state leaders don't really want hunting to be allowed, but it's necessary for population control. So they don't put much effort into the program to train new hunters, and don't provide enough funding to DEEP programs related to hunting and fishing.

It sucks, if you try talking to most legislators, they either don't care, or think all hunters are mass shooters, even if they bow hunt.

4

PeteyWinkle t1_j5z3riu wrote

>It's good to keep the legislature's wage low. Otherwise, you get the problem the overall US congress has; people who use their positions to reap all manner of profit with just enough credibility to keep getting elected, all but guaranteeing they serve their entire lives.

That's the exact opposite impact. Low wages increase potential for corruption and incentivize alternate streams of income that can lead to conflicts of interest (speaking engagements, etc). If they made good money with their legislative role they wouldn't need to use their position to "reap all manner of profit."

It also makes it nearly impossible for a working class person to serve as a legislator. If we want more "relatable" legislators we should pay them well so anyone with qualifications can do it. As it is now, it's very difficult to serve if you don't already have a lot of money.

7

B6304T4 t1_j5z2cvg wrote

If you can call the field office running the course I would. My buddy had a similar issue with the firearm registration and he called and got a spot. He initially registered and had to no show for some family issues and they wouldn't let him re register because his account got flagged. He was told that people from some anti hunting organizations had been registering for the classes and then no showing to keep people who need the class from getting in. But after talking to someone he was able to get into the next one. I got my firearm cert during early covid and it was pretty easy to get into for me so I can't share the same sentiment.

5