Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

mynameisnotshamus t1_j652qaj wrote

Ehhh. It was posted without comment. That’s a “hey, look at this” post. OP may have commented later, and they may have had hopes of raising general awareness by posting, but without that context it doesn’t initially appear so. There was no “honest discussion” brought up by OP. If that is your intent, you’d tend to actually say that.

I don’t think there are many people who aren’t aware that there’s a lot of people out there suffering and many who take their own life. Simple awareness doesn’t do anything. If you’ve ever been involved in anything super tragic or known anyone who has, having it appear in the news can make it even more difficult. Edit: adding: I’m in no way saying I’m right here. I’m just stating my opinion. I appreciate the discussion.

0

IndicationOver OP t1_j651oot wrote

You are entitled to your opinion I don't agree but I understand your point also.

I do not know this mans life and what he was going thru, like I said before outside looking in seems like one would think he has a perfect life.

If money is all that matters to you I get it, in your head rich people do not have the right to have depression, stress, or suicidal ideation?

0

RededHaid t1_j650yw5 wrote

I disagree with you. Cars are for when you have things to do and aren’t spending time going downtown to transfer for the blue line back out of town. Busses are awesome for long distances but not when you associate them with the port authority bus station in New York.

1

Plants_Golf_Cooking t1_j64ykur wrote

Considering the comparative ability of one class to get help over the other I would say it is not a perfect tit-for-tat to the point that I would certainly feel different, perhaps even sympathy were it from someone who, I’m just going to guess, had stressors that were a little more real. Why should I feel bad for someone who gets evicted from their home when that home was a mansion? I feel a similar logic applies here.

−3

absurd-bird-turd t1_j64xv4d wrote

I know that people always argue against the one more lane thing. But atleast in the south east where I-95 is only two lanes it really should be 3. I mean there are sections where the grade is pretty high and often times the entire highway gets held up by two 18 wheelers trying to drag race up a hill at 45 mph. Sure in the long run it would relieve all the congestion. But its getting more and more to be a safety issue that its not 3 lanes at this point

3