Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

CiforDayZServer t1_j66iq4y wrote

Northeast, in general, no one will care, or they even might like that you wear a cowboy hat, especially if it’s because you moved from Texas.

CT, same as above for the most part.

If you’re moving to Fairfield county, still wear it, but be ready for random opinions from people you didn’t ask.

1

Kim_Jong_The_Illest_ t1_j66imd3 wrote

The VO bomb i believe is one person because it is so distinctive and has so little variation. But the other two, i believe is some mix of a small crew, and, like you said, copy cats and such—people spreading it. That’s just a gut feeling, but the variations make it seem like it’s not the work of one person.

2

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j66hxtu wrote

That's interesting. So you think Veoh, VO, and Veo, are three separate tags for three separate taggers, with the third one possibly being like a crew or a meme or something?

I had assumed Veoh, VO, and Veo, was just variation of one tagger, for style, mood, and perhaps, I always thought, time. Figured it must be cool to have a nickname you can spell these different ways.

3

Kim_Jong_The_Illest_ t1_j66hfxy wrote

Well, there are variations. Sometimes there is a dot inside the O; sometimes there is an H at the end. Usually someone who tags or bombs does it in a fairly consistent way. Styles evolve and such, but a whole letter is a big difference; the dot is something distinctive. As someone who used to do graffiti and had lots of friends who did it (i don’t partake any more but still am way too into it), it strikes me as something a single artist wouldn’t do (the variations, that is).

Then there is the VO bomb thats around that often doesn’t have a VEO tag with it. I do think that is a singular person bc the style is distinct and there isn’t variation. But the VEO tag, my gut tells me it’s more than one person.

3

AhbabaOooMaoMao t1_j66fvpr wrote

I've thought a lot about this and I'm curious as to your reasons.

I think there are definitely some copycats. For example, the low effort Veo scratched into the clear plastic that overlays the LCD screen at a gas pump in Hartford. I might wager that all of those are plagiarists.

When it comes to the more moderate-effort stuff, such as on a utility pole or sign along a busy roadway, so intentionally and overtly scrawled upon our concrete jungle, I think it's almost entirely the real tagger. The ones that aren't "real" are one-time thrill seekers or petty vandals, acting on opportunity, without creativity to think of anything else to write.

The ones up on bridges and the fully articulated ones all like V̷̶̘̻͔̟ͬ̋̇ͪͪ̑̓ȩ̷̵͎̘͎͙̹̺̮̈͆̓̋ͩ̌o̠̦͓̜̠̐͜͝ĥ̻̼̻̦̩̋ͫͬ̿ and stuff in full color, for someone else to do it, defeats the concept of tagging. And the risk of getting caught red handed as a notorious vandal of private, local, and state property, who would risk that but the true tagger?

I assume it's basically all the person does and definitely has help, maybe a couple of close family or crew, to drive, scout, and lookout. I assume the person has a job that requires them to be mobile throughout the region, and possibly works with said accomplices.

I find it amazing that someone has not been caught and charged with a significant amount of these. Shit I wonder if I can launch my own investigation and file a qui tam action against the person to recover the state's money, on its behalf, a fee for my time of course.

4

ghost_amanita t1_j66f11k wrote

Last visit I tried a 3 pack of mini sliders from the Portly Pig--surprisingly good. They nicely toasted each one of those mini sweet buns, and you can get 2 BBQ sauces of your choice on the side. Plus I ordered coleslaw and corn sides. I think it was a brisket, PP, and pulled ribs? Fantastic!

So happy that my vegetarian family also has options here, and I can indulge in meaty goodness.

3

uuuge OP t1_j66dbmr wrote

Reply to comment by uuuge in CT Subaru drivers by uuuge

If you disagree, I hereby challenge you to a road course in the Walmart parking lot of your choosing. I'll bring the orange cones. I'll record it for posterity and also for Reddit to help further my theory.

1

toasterb t1_j66d71f wrote

To be clear, I'm not referring to the suburbs being too far spaced between each other -- which may be the case. The homes are just too spread out and nobody can do anything but drive to get day-to-day tasks done.

For buses to be functional, you need a critical mass of folks that can easily walk to bus stops and then those buses need to be able to relatively quickly get them to where they need to go. And that means more density.

Though I think a lot of this is semantics about what a "suburb" actually is. We need more "urban style" development whether that happens in towns we think of as "suburbs" or not.

CT could actually have decent bones to support more transit in certain cities. But we have hollowed out our downtowns to the point where there's nothing worth going to there. And the malls/big box stores have really cemented it.

It'll take a big shift in how we live to really make a change. Living in a city now, we get by just fine as a family of four with one car, and honestly we don't use the car all that much. Lots of buses and cycling. It's pretty great.

3