Recent comments in /f/Connecticut

the_lamou t1_j6a0i5d wrote

Sorry, you're going to have to elaborate: accurate at determining what, exactly? "Accurate" without context is a meaningless descriptor. I will agree that it's the most accurate way to identify the one person out of a group that is the least disliked save least offensive to the most people. Personally, I think regressing to mediocrity isn't great for any political system.

−2

Whaddaulookinat OP t1_j69ysoz wrote

>We need more development in dense and TOD areas, but I’ve seen this law be more of a boon for greedy developers encroaching on single family neighborhoods. There’s gotta be a better way.

The better way was for town pnz boards not to stifle growth and smaller units for 3 decades, and have been warned through that whole time. They went the greedy way themselves and now want to change the rules so they can fuck up our economy further.

2