Recent comments in /f/EarthPorn

Dovahkiinthesardine t1_jc6njfs wrote

most of Germany's forests nowadays were artificially planted. From the middle ages onwards and especially during the industrial revolution a lot was chopped down, then also again during both world wars, basically most forest were used industrially. After WW2 there was a lot of reforesting done

4

ryanechols OP t1_jc6jym0 wrote

Was about 30-45 minutes. We parked just outside the Amitabha Stupa Peace Park and walked through the park and then onto the upper Chimney Rock trail to the to the top where you can either scramble left to the top of Chimney Rock, or scramble right and climb the big boulders next to it for an amazing view of the entire Sedona valley below facing east.

1

Landhund t1_jc6jpnl wrote

I've been there last May for just short of a week and dear lord the landscape there is just so unreasonably gorgeous, it's almost ridiculous! If Norway wasn't so damn expensive I'd go there every year

Quick Edit: Actually, that view looks kinda familiar... this wouldn't be along the 815 on the eastern shore of Vestvågoy by any chance?

2

explodingwhale17 t1_jc6ho0x wrote

It looks like a tree plantation or heavily managed forest where an area was cleared years ago and replanted with seedlings all of the same age, in rows. This patch of forest will be cut at some time in the future. The forest as a whole is made of many patches of different ages, scheduled to be cut at different times.

The trees have dropped their lower limbs as they grew probably because of competition for light.

A tree that grows taller and puts less energy into maintaining lower limbs will be more successful in such an environment. Foresters plant trees closely enough to cause such growth as it results in straight, tall trunks.

There is a park like look to the scene because of the lack of understory. This is most likely also because of an even lack of light. If there were some dead trees there would be small areas of sunlight with grasses, ferns, small bushes, etc.

The second reason is that the forest floor is covered with moss. This means the area is wet enough of the time to support moss and may not be appropriate for many other plants that you might find in similar light levels. The carpet of pine needles that probably falls may also prevent the growth of some low understory plants.

At least, that's my interpretation of the scene.

10

neongecko12 t1_jc6hhmd wrote

It's commercial woodland. They're planted in rows as it's easiest for the machinery to deal with. The trees grow up as they have to compete for light as they're so close together, there's no point growing branches low down, as that wastes energy.

It's not particularly biodiverse, but it's often better than most of the other profitable uses for the land in an environmental sense.

30

joeclarkestudio OP t1_jc6brli wrote

Taken in the Lofoten Islands of Norway. There really are views like this everywhere you look and it makes it quite hard to drive from one spot to another without wanting to stop at every turn to get out and admire the view. This is just on the side of the road and ended up being one of my favourite spots to explore on my whole trip.

Canon 5DIII with 24-70mm

More of my work on my Instagram or website

9

AutoModerator t1_jc69qbs wrote

Hi joeclarkestudio! Dont worry, this message does not mean that your post is removed. This is a reminder to quickly check your post to make sure it doesnt break any of our rules. Human moderators check the following --

Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1