Recent comments in /f/Futurology

wolfkeeper t1_jef7gcn wrote

Primary energy is mostly waste heat. Using it massively overstates its importance. Electrification usually cuts energy use by 1/2 to 2/3. Once you allow for that, you find we're much closer to net zero than you would expect.

2

VIOLENT_WIENER_STORM t1_jef71hz wrote

This article made it seem like Biden just reversed course on climate change, but that’s completely false. The Guardian forgets to mention a lot of details about how Biden has been fighting this since his first month in office. Here they are:

  1. Biden put a moratorium on new drilling leases with section 4 of this executive order when he came into office.

  2. This is the first time the Department of the Interior has allowed a new lease since Biden took office.

  3. Why reverse the policy? Well, Biden has no choice.

13 GOP-led States sued the Biden Administration in 2021, and they won in 2022. Led by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and accompanied by 12 other Red states, their case stated that Biden didn’t have the authority to halt new leases with an Executive Order. Judge Terry Doughty of the Western District Court of Louisiana, a Trump appointee, deemed the executive order unconstitutional and ordered the Biden administration to lift the ban.

  1. Actual production of oil from this lease won’t happen for about a year due to the amount of work required to begin drilling. The Biden Administration plans to appeal the court’s decision so they can get the moratorium reinstated. Also, there is still time to enact policies that will reduce environmental damage.

Schedule/timeline for BLM Lease bidding system: https://nflss.blm.gov/leasesale/list

Harvard’s litigation tracker related to this battle: https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/2021/12/leasing-pause-and-review/

1

skedeebs t1_jef6c3r wrote

I think this is great news, but I am very skeptical of attempts to predict the future based on "at current rates." Sure, at their current pace, my Washington Nationals would lose 162 games this year. They will lose a crazy number of games, but not that many.

4

grundar t1_jef5cq1 wrote

> we need to move away from lithium batteries.

Why?

The dominant lithium producer is Australia, which produces via standard hard-rock mining, so producing most lithium is no more harmful than any other developed-world mine.

Compared to the 7,500 Mt of coal mined per year and 4,200 Mt of oil extracted per year, mining 0.1Mt of lithium is not an urgent environmental or social issue.

(In case you were thinking about cobalt, LFP batteries use no cobalt and will reach 50% market share in the next few years.)

2

FuturologyBot t1_jef2ae2 wrote

The following submission statement was provided by /u/DisasterousGiraffe:


"In Europe, heat pumps enjoyed a record year, with sales growing by nearly 40%. In particular, sales of air-to-water models, which are compatible with typical radiators and underfloor heating systems, jumped by almost 50% in Europe. In the United States, heat pump purchases exceeded those of gas furnaces."


Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/127nr2k/heat_pumps_could_supply_20_of_building_heating_by/jeexlmi/

1