Recent comments in /f/Futurology
kushal1509 t1_jef8g99 wrote
Reply to comment by Lomotpk3141 in Futurology CMV - We are probably never going to see the changes envisioned by AI enthusiasts. by dja_ra
In 1950s computers were said to revolutionise everything and they did.
wolfkeeper t1_jef7gcn wrote
Reply to comment by litritium in The European Union to nearly double the share of renewables in the 27-nation bloc's energy consumption by 2030 amid efforts to become carbon neutral and ditch Russian fossil fuels. by chrisdh79
Primary energy is mostly waste heat. Using it massively overstates its importance. Electrification usually cuts energy use by 1/2 to 2/3. Once you allow for that, you find we're much closer to net zero than you would expect.
Lomotpk3141 t1_jef7fa9 wrote
Reply to comment by kushal1509 in Futurology CMV - We are probably never going to see the changes envisioned by AI enthusiasts. by dja_ra
1950 - Nuclear tech was going to revolutionize....everything.
VIOLENT_WIENER_STORM t1_jef71hz wrote
This article made it seem like Biden just reversed course on climate change, but that’s completely false. The Guardian forgets to mention a lot of details about how Biden has been fighting this since his first month in office. Here they are:
- 
Biden put a moratorium on new drilling leases with section 4 of this executive order when he came into office.
 - 
This is the first time the Department of the Interior has allowed a new lease since Biden took office.
 - 
Why reverse the policy? Well, Biden has no choice.
 
13 GOP-led States sued the Biden Administration in 2021, and they won in 2022. Led by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and accompanied by 12 other Red states, their case stated that Biden didn’t have the authority to halt new leases with an Executive Order. Judge Terry Doughty of the Western District Court of Louisiana, a Trump appointee, deemed the executive order unconstitutional and ordered the Biden administration to lift the ban.
- Actual production of oil from this lease won’t happen for about a year due to the amount of work required to begin drilling. The Biden Administration plans to appeal the court’s decision so they can get the moratorium reinstated. Also, there is still time to enact policies that will reduce environmental damage.
 
Schedule/timeline for BLM Lease bidding system: https://nflss.blm.gov/leasesale/list
Harvard’s litigation tracker related to this battle: https://eelp.law.harvard.edu/2021/12/leasing-pause-and-review/
SolarFreakingPunk t1_jef6w1r wrote
Reply to comment by planetharrier in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
That's alright, we all have our mechanomoments every now and then
MadderThanRoyKent t1_jef6dw6 wrote
The fact that NASA has to farm this out to Nokia is upsetting.
skedeebs t1_jef6c3r wrote
Reply to Heat Pumps could supply 20% of building heating by 2030. Supercritical CO2 heat pump sales in Japan have now reached a total of 8.5 million units. by DisasterousGiraffe
I think this is great news, but I am very skeptical of attempts to predict the future based on "at current rates." Sure, at their current pace, my Washington Nationals would lose 162 games this year. They will lose a crazy number of games, but not that many.
could_use_a_snack t1_jef65w5 wrote
Reply to comment by dstar-dstar in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
I think it's a new technology that uses less energy and less dangerous chemicals to recover the lithium. It might not get as much out, but it's more cost effective.
[deleted] t1_jef5v9n wrote
NeighborhoodDog t1_jef5tq1 wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
I thought redwood materials was already recovering 90%+ of battery materials.
grundar t1_jef5cq1 wrote
Reply to comment by GwynbleiddSilver in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
> we need to move away from lithium batteries.
Why?
The dominant lithium producer is Australia, which produces via standard hard-rock mining, so producing most lithium is no more harmful than any other developed-world mine.
Compared to the 7,500 Mt of coal mined per year and 4,200 Mt of oil extracted per year, mining 0.1Mt of lithium is not an urgent environmental or social issue.
(In case you were thinking about cobalt, LFP batteries use no cobalt and will reach 50% market share in the next few years.)
Fiyanggu t1_jef4xhp wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
What happens to the remaining 30% lithium? Losing approximately a third of the lithium seems wasteful.
PotentialHornet160 t1_jef4jde wrote
Reply to comment by dnadude in Cultured Chicken Is a Step Closer as a Second US Company Gets FDA Approved by virtualmase
This could be a great thing for the environment though. I see a future where most people live in cities and the vast majority of land is preserved. Ecotourism would be huge. Imagine the buffalo once again roaming the US because there’s no more farmland to break up their habitat.
kindle139 t1_jef4e5d wrote
Reply to comment by AbstractMirror in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
Yeah man, humanity can really be quite.. human. Our capacity for greatness is matched only by our capacity for folly.
xFaceDeskx t1_jef45zj wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Don't say it's environmentally friendly, republicans may hear you and disagree
RealRaven6229 t1_jef3uen wrote
Reply to comment by Evipicc in In a post-scarcity utopia, is there a real necessity of human labor of any kind? by kvothekevin
That's the point of the story! It's just a genuine exploration of that concept. My conclusion is that it's terrifying but perhaps yours would be different. Give it a read!
ThePikol OP t1_jef2nt5 wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Shine-1622 in What if we could alter melanin levels via gene modifications? by ThePikol
Is it a thing? What can you choose?
ApricotBeneficial452 t1_jef2j9l wrote
Reply to comment by Bucktabulous in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Excuse the tinfoil on my head, but is it being done ON PURPOSE?!
I have heard, but haven't retained the reason it is happening. Care to eli5?
FuturologyBot t1_jef2ae2 wrote
Reply to Heat Pumps could supply 20% of building heating by 2030. Supercritical CO2 heat pump sales in Japan have now reached a total of 8.5 million units. by DisasterousGiraffe
The following submission statement was provided by /u/DisasterousGiraffe:
"In Europe, heat pumps enjoyed a record year, with sales growing by nearly 40%. In particular, sales of air-to-water models, which are compatible with typical radiators and underfloor heating systems, jumped by almost 50% in Europe. In the United States, heat pump purchases exceeded those of gas furnaces."
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/127nr2k/heat_pumps_could_supply_20_of_building_heating_by/jeexlmi/
wigwamyurtfish t1_jef2164 wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
That's great. I wonder, once scaled, if it will be done with a variety of batteries or only large car batteries. Hopefully that gets sorted out along the way.
[deleted] t1_jef1zmx wrote
[removed]
CptHammer_ t1_jef1qxc wrote
Reply to comment by RuinLoes in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
Carbon credits have nothing to do with charging companies who pass the cost on to consumers for carbon going into the air... Got it, thanks.
Beyond-Time t1_jef0umz wrote
Reply to comment by ahecht in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Very obviously it would be contained. Vanadium is just one of the projects that can pan out, albeit expensive. Other forms would be preferable.
whiteknives t1_jef8l8q wrote
Reply to comment by Pehz in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
I’d say wasting 30% of the lithium, cobalt, nickel, etc. in the new way isn’t exactly “environmentally friendly” either. Those wasted materials don’t just disappear.