Recent comments in /f/Futurology
ilovecronaldo7 t1_jefuh83 wrote
Reply to comment by hollowrift in Hyperloop technology could revolutionize transportation with ultra-high-speed, environmentally friendly travel up to 700 miles per hour, and student-led initiatives like HYPED are dedicated to making this a reality through innovative design and development. by intengineering
Fuck school lunches I want this. I hate flying
Doomscrolla99 t1_jefu5vu wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Does it restore the vast tracks of strip-mined land or purify the resulting tailing pools?
YakComplete3569 t1_jeftulq wrote
Reply to comment by Mudgeon in Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
Gun control. Paramilitary police forces. Drones. Thermal. Organizations that watch and track everybody and flag certain individuals. Chances of a revolution in the United States is pretty slim to none. All those AR-15s and shit are just popguns when armored police come through your walls. Or a national guard tank. Yea there are a lot of capable modern weapons but who has them? People are joking about T-55's but it is still a tank and if your squad doesn't have an anti-tank weapon then you still are at a disadvantage. There is a country recently that had about 2 million students protest. Just a protest. Almost all of them have disappeared. So those who think they are going to start a revolution in today's information age, you will be squashed before you are big enough to make an impact. In almost any country.
offlinebound t1_jeftgr2 wrote
Reply to AI, democracy and unemployment by [deleted]
"AI will direct a vast portion of the population into a sort of conveyor belt humans, same ideas, same words, same goals, and so on."
Pretty much where we already are as a society
AviMkv t1_jeftgis wrote
Reply to comment by RiiCreated in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
What do you think is cheaper, refining mud full of random shit to lithium or refining a battery made of 4-5 high quality materials including high amounts of lithium?
Formal-Character-640 t1_jefte5z wrote
Reply to comment by Evipicc in In a post-scarcity utopia, is there a real necessity of human labor of any kind? by kvothekevin
No one is saying that AI will be attached to nukes. Stop making up irrelevant points to appear credible.
The mass public deployment and rapid advancement of AI at a pace that we’re not prepared for or at a level of disruption that we don’t fully understand is the issue. It’s not fear mongering to demand that we do everything possible to guarantee safety and prosperity of this and future generations. And so far there is little to no action from the government. The open letter is just that.. a letter. This is a time-sensitive problem that we may not have a chance to fix if we fuck up now.
Bucktabulous t1_jefsxcr wrote
Reply to comment by AgentTin in Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Yeah, for whatever reason, they've chosen the deserts of Utah to grow Alfalfa, a grass-style feedstock that needs an upsetting amount of water.
GodAndGaming123 OP t1_jefspt5 wrote
Reply to comment by AppliedTechStuff in AI Investing Future: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Investment Landscape by GodAndGaming123
That's what I'm worried about. It will remove all opportunity
[deleted] t1_jefsnwk wrote
Reply to comment by HP_10bII in AI Investing Future: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Investment Landscape by GodAndGaming123
[removed]
Iffykindofguy t1_jefsa6w wrote
Reply to AI, democracy and unemployment by [deleted]
As these tools make themselves more present in the everyday life of people we will see a rise in a sort of intellectual atrophy. AI would do the thinking for most people, AI will take the decision for most people, AI will direct a vast portion of the population into a sort of conveyor belt humans, same ideas, same words, same goals, and so on.
​
this wildly overestimates how much "thinking" the average person does today. Most people, yourself included, are so on autopilot we barely take in any new information. This is not a concern. Why would people lose their curiosity anymore so than they already have?
CptHammer_ t1_jefrqgx wrote
Reply to comment by RuinLoes in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
>A carbon credit is a tradable certificate or permit representing the right to emit a set amount of carbon dioxide or the equivalent amount of a different greenhouse gas.
Please edit the Wikipedia page to reflect that it has nothing to do with air and isn't a form of added value. It's clearly wrong because you know so much.
zinton47 t1_jefrmvc wrote
Reply to Inexpensive and environmentally friendly mechanochemical recycling process recovers 70% of lithium from batteries by chrisdh79
Good, now do it for Nickel and Cobolt which is actually needed for NCA (Nickel Cobolt Alumium) li ion batteries that are used in cars. Lithium is relatively abundant, I hear the real bottle neck to electrical car production is the two more rare resources of Nickel and Cobolt.
alecs_stan t1_jefqkgf wrote
Reply to comment by HongoMushroomMan in Does ChatGPT have a sense of humor? by Tripwir62
You'll never get official access to that one.
FuturologyBot t1_jefqipg wrote
Reply to AI Investing Future: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Investment Landscape by GodAndGaming123
The following submission statement was provided by /u/GodAndGaming123:
AI has been going crazy and pushing basically every industry in existence. It's like all I see on Twitter. The stock market is a personal interest of mine and most openly available AI solutions actively block off the ability for financial advice. What do you think the future looks like with AI ramping up? Will the markets have any room for human interaction?
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/127smx0/ai_investing_future_how_artificial_intelligence/jeflhmc/
AppliedTechStuff t1_jefps5s wrote
Reply to AI Investing Future: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Investment Landscape by GodAndGaming123
AI will NOT make investing more profitable. Ultimately, it will make "alpha" nearly impossible to find.
Remember how you used to be able to pick stocks and outperform the market? Once everyone adopts the same strategies, alpha disappears.
HP_10bII t1_jefppw2 wrote
Reply to comment by GodAndGaming123 in AI Investing Future: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming the Investment Landscape by GodAndGaming123
Even bloomberg is switching from monetising terminal to monetising API calls... The future is already here...
KamaKairade t1_jefphn3 wrote
Pet peeve:
A "Security" camera is a camera that secures something. EG: A camera is on one side of a locked door and someone monitoring the camera authorizes the door to be unlocked.
A" "Surveillance" camera is a camera that does nothing to secure something and simply records/views. EG: It provides a record who goes through an unlocked door.
[deleted] t1_jefpc4k wrote
Reply to comment by Singular_Lens_37 in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jefp8xd wrote
Reply to comment by Actaeus86 in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
[removed]
Eokokok t1_jefp6rw wrote
Reply to comment by youreblockingmyshot in Heat Pumps could supply 20% of building heating by 2030. Supercritical CO2 heat pump sales in Japan have now reached a total of 8.5 million units. by DisasterousGiraffe
It does not work more efficiently though - it offers higher end of output range but it has pretty bad efficiency cycle overall, specifically bad on low input (outside) temperatures.
No idea why everyone is so excited about those, given most building would benefit more from actually getting more thermo work done and not just changing the energy source in the first place for something that is not particularly efficient in the first place...
deadlands_goon t1_jefp4bc wrote
Reply to comment by luced in US puts Italy-sized chunk of Gulf of Mexico up for auction for oil drilling by capcaunul
lol okay sorry you feel that way
Scope_Dog t1_jefp2hs wrote
Reply to In a post-scarcity utopia, is there a real necessity of human labor of any kind? by kvothekevin
yes, even in a world where every possible need is met by technology, you still need people to direct that power. You still need city planning, fashion design, product development, landscape design, etc. not to mention long term goals like expansion into space. This requires people to make educated decisions, and directing that labor toward desirable outcomes.
AppliedTechStuff t1_jefp2ha wrote
Reply to comment by disembodied_voice in New cars sold in EU must be zero-emission from 2035 by Vucea
Interesting... 21,000 vs. 125,000. Thanks. (Another source to consider.)
Just__Tyler t1_jefop6d wrote
Reply to comment by Suolucidir in Is it possible that AI is already in control of our society. by Crazy-Mall-5301
While I don't disagree with you on AI actually controlling society, a relatively large portion of the American stock economy has been proliferated by the trading algorithm Aladdin since 1997. "[Aladdin] controls over half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, and 10% of the stock market." https://innotechtoday.com/blackrock-is-the-biggest-company-youve-never-heard-of/#:~:text=Aladdin%20executes%20trades%20in%20every,10%25%20of%20the%20stock%20market.
YakComplete3569 t1_jefujah wrote
Reply to Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
Remember when people used to say that there are too many people. Some even tried to compute a number for what the population should be... I'm glad that shit went away, thanks Elon. Would hate to start killing off old people and stupid people and whomever else gets judged as non-essential persons. If such a thing existed than you too will be judged non-essential at some point.