Recent comments in /f/InternetIsBeautiful
redabishai t1_j2sar7s wrote
Reply to comment by YouJustSaidButFuck in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
*whom do they fux
redabishai t1_j2sant2 wrote
Reply to comment by tlklk in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
I've heard this is why phone numbers are 7 digits. Not sure how true that is.
Colon t1_j2sal1w wrote
Reply to comment by kepler1 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
that leading of the top descriptions/top NAV is killing me
CornCheeseMafia t1_j2sa9yn wrote
Reply to comment by currywurst777 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Why use complex shape when simple shape do trick
kepler1 t1_j2s73mv wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
It would be so much more useful if the linked site weren't just a nice-looking page giving the written definitions of the concepts, but actually showed examples of the effects/principles that they're seeking to convey. It's a beautiful website, sure (how much time did the person spend on those symbols/tiles alone?), but not what I expect when someone stands up an entire website to show graphical concepts.
In a way, it is itself an example of the mistake of form over function.
persondude27 t1_j2s6vus wrote
Reply to comment by Protonis in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Haha, that was my first thought as well.
One of the guys in my squad is a marketing dude and was ranting about "depth first design" and "hulu's crappy designers" last night.
[deleted] t1_j2s6aru wrote
Reply to comment by currywurst777 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
[deleted]
cyph_8 t1_j2s5v30 wrote
Reply to comment by cyph_8 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Ahh, because my screen is 32"... Should a font size range be part of UX laws?
YouJustSaidButFuck t1_j2s5nvw wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Who is Lawso, and what does he Fux?
cartesianfaith t1_j2s5ghh wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Interestingly, I imagine these "laws" help explain how conspiracy theories develop.
cyph_8 t1_j2s4xzx wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Why does the website feel like font size 300? Is this only me?
Protonis t1_j2s4tpe wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
The Modern Warfare 2 Devs should see this 💀
currywurst777 t1_j2s2xg2 wrote
Reply to comment by while-eating-pasta in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Use easy shapes got it.
tlklk t1_j2s1b5a wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Rule number 12 of 21: The average person can only keep 7 items in their working memory 🤔
while-eating-pasta t1_j2s11f9 wrote
Reply to comment by currywurst777 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
The more complex the graphic the more detail the viewer will skip over.
Basic plain circle and circle with dot in the middle? You'll spot the difference easily so they work as two distinct elements.
22 sided polygon with gothic inspired pattern in the middle vs 18 sided polygon with art nouveau pattern? The viewer will simplify them down to "circle with stuff inside" and miss the differences.
[deleted] t1_j2rzcal wrote
Reply to comment by currywurst777 in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
[deleted]
currywurst777 t1_j2ry47m wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Can someone explain the takeaways 1. and 3. for the Law of Prägnanz to me?
Abhi_GGMU t1_j2rvs4h wrote
Reply to comment by DaRKVoi in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
What's your favourite law among the 21?
DaRKVoi t1_j2rr8ii wrote
Reply to The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Discovered this site a few years back and recommended it to everyone who joins my team. Interesting stuff.
miickel OP t1_j2r0pgx wrote
Reply to comment by mach219 in Mind-blowing art from your photos, by Partly AI by miickel
Yes it’s very cheap
mach219 t1_j2o930w wrote
Mindblowing price
CaCtUs2003 t1_j2o3i6o wrote
Reply to comment by paulvs88 in Mind-blowing art from your photos, by Partly AI by miickel
If you're willing to spend money, spend it by hiring an actual, human artist.
Kegrun t1_j2m785i wrote
Reply to comment by BookerCatchanSTD in Mind-blowing art from your photos, by Partly AI by miickel
It’s what most people use as their ig main photo now. All my ugly friends are beautiful
zappyzapzap t1_j2lwzym wrote
Reply to Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. by akiptif
Couldn't find an option to filter by peer reviewed status. Kinda useless
sleepyeyessleep t1_j2sawyf wrote
Reply to comment by CornCheeseMafia in The Laws of UX - beautiful website explaining 21 rules for effective UX design by Quackerooney
Maybe if your filtering for a specific type of person?