Recent comments in /f/MachineLearning
whyelrond t1_jdes8ue wrote
Reply to comment by ZenDragon in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Most excited about this plugin. It's a nice combination of symbolic and deep learning based approaches.
iamspro t1_jderz7f wrote
Reply to comment by endless_sea_of_stars in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
I tried fine tuning vs few shot for my own implementation and in the end few shot was just much easier, despite the context window drawback. Huge advantage is you can dynamically add/remove/update APIs in an instant.
_Arsenie_Boca_ t1_jder0rp wrote
Reply to [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Bad news for langchain
WarmSignificance1 t1_jdeqxg8 wrote
Reply to comment by race2tb in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Seems like trying to fit a square peg. Why would you want to do this instead of having a static website?
If we’re talking about dynamic websites that’s a whole different ballgame, and LLMs seem even less appropriate for them.
ThisIsMyStonerAcount t1_jdeqmjc wrote
What's your end goal?
iamspro t1_jdeq8jw wrote
Reply to comment by nightofgrim in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Awesome I did the same, plus a step to send those commands to the home assistant API. Then with Shortcuts I added a way to send the arbitrary sentence from Siri to this server. Still a bit awkward though because you have to say something like "hey siri tell gpt to turn off the kitchen light"
sebzim4500 t1_jdeq6uo wrote
Reply to comment by light24bulbs in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
There may have been pretraining in how to use tools in general, but there is no pretraining about how to use any third party tool in particular. You just write a short description of the endpoints and it gets included in the prompt.
The fact that this apparently works so well is incredible, probably the most impressed I've been with any developement since the original ChatGPT release (which feels like a decade ago now)
underPanther t1_jdeofve wrote
Reply to comment by andrew21w in [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
Sorry for the confusion! It's discriminatory activations that lead to universality in wide single layer networks. I've editted post to reflect this.
As an aside, you might also find the following interesting which is also extremely well-cited: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0893608005801315
ghostfaceschiller t1_jdenoo2 wrote
Reply to comment by BigDoooer in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Here's a standalone product which is a chatbot with a memory. But look at LangChain for several ways to implement the same thing.
The basic idea is: periodically feed your conversation history to the embeddings API and save the embeddings to a local vectorstore, which is the "long-term memory". Then, any time you send a message or question to the bot, first send that message to embeddings API (super cheap and fast), run a local comparison, and prepend any relevant contextual info ("memories") to your prompt as it gets sent to the bot.
frequenttimetraveler t1_jdemv5n wrote
Reply to comment by RedditLovingSun in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Google will more likely come up with its own version of this. It's already in every android phone and the iphone search box. It's a natural fit
Despite being there first, microsoft will have a hard time when google gatekeeps everything
RedditLovingSun t1_jdemr0b wrote
Reply to comment by nightofgrim in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
That's awesome I've been thinking of trying something similar with a raspberry pi with various inputs and outputs but am having trouble thinking of practical functions it could provide. Question, how did you hook the model to the smart home devices, did program your own apis that chatgpt could use?
Puzzleheaded_Acadia1 t1_jdeml1p wrote
Reply to [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Why everyone excited for chatgpt plugins?
Nyanraltotlapun t1_jdeltnm wrote
Reply to comment by SomeLongWindedIdiot in [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
Long story short, main property of complex systems is the ability to pretend and mimic. So the real safety of AI lies in its physical limitations (compute power algos etc.) the same limitations that makes them less useful less capable. So the more powerful AI is the less safe it is. There more danger it poses. And it is dangerous alright. More dangerous than nuclear weapons is.
BigDoooer t1_jdele0p wrote
Reply to comment by ghostfaceschiller in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
I’m not familiar with these. Can you give the name/location if one to check out?
Makin- t1_jdel2q2 wrote
Reply to comment by Smallpaul in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
"Prompt", presumably.
[deleted] t1_jdeku5m wrote
Reply to comment by Jean-Porte in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
[deleted]
frequenttimetraveler t1_jdekst3 wrote
Reply to comment by race2tb in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
> Why do I need a website if I can just feed model my info have it generate everything when people want my content.
It will be a big deal if openAI pays for content.
ghostfaceschiller t1_jdekpke wrote
Reply to comment by psdwizzard in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Trivially easy to build using the embeddings api, already a bunch of 3rd party tools that give you this. I’d be surprised if it doesn’t exist as one of the default tools within a week of the initial rollout.
EDIT: OK yeah it does already exist a part of the initial rollout - https://github.com/openai/chatgpt-retrieval-plugin#memory-feature
frequenttimetraveler t1_jdekma7 wrote
Reply to [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Does this turn ChatGPT to WeChatGPT?
If this means the end of Apps, i m all for it
ghostfaceschiller t1_jdekaf3 wrote
Reply to comment by drunk-en-monk-ey in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
People really need to update their priors on what kind of things are straightforwardly possible or not. Like if you majorly updated your expectations last week, you are way behind and need to update them again.
JigglyWiener t1_jdek7wq wrote
Reply to [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
This feels one step closer to the Enterprise Ship Computer. Super exciting stuff.
zy415 OP t1_jdejz0z wrote
Reply to comment by sleeplessinseattle00 in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
Same situation as yours. Good luck to us
Smallpaul t1_jdejh9x wrote
Reply to comment by nightofgrim in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
>I crafted a promoted to get ChatGPT
?
sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdeir9w wrote
Reply to [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
Haven't received any response yet. I've answered all of the raised clarification and extra experimentation, but at this point, I really can't do much if they're just gonna ghost me.
PS: I am also a reviewer and I've finished responding to all of the papers assigned in my pool.
xt-89 t1_jdessgl wrote
Reply to comment by ghostfaceschiller in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
This also opens the door to a lot of complex algorithms for retrieving the correct memories