eeeeeeebay

Maybe $200 on a bad day, but still far better than anything newer

Sigh, that must be frustrating. What score did the reviewer give?

I was supposed to click the link, I see

Edit: Apperently jokes are not allowed.

Gee, never thought one day Wolfram will be the hot buzz topic. My number theory professor will jump from his chair.

[deleted]

What about BLOOM ?

Self preservation as a concept is something, it can learn about, talk about, express etc. But in order for it to act on it, we have to explicitly tune its instructions for it. For sake of argument, even if the AI can act on it, it has to be given the controls. Nobody in their sane mind will do that. For somewhat related analogy, if people could give the control of their cars to people in other countries over the internet, it could cause a lot of mayhem, correct? Clearly the technology exists to do it and everyone is free to try. Why is this not a big problem today?

LLama is not open-source (though it is gratis).

Edit: typo

It has already become relentless and we've seen nothing yet.

Alpaca is not open source, and neither is LLaMA. The only good open source one I know is OpenAssistant.

Plug-in in computer science terms is a way to add functionality to an app without changing its core code. A mod for Minecraft is a type of plug-in.

For ChatGPT it is a way for it to call programs that live outside its servers.

>They seem to refer to this model as text-only, contradicting to the known fact that GPT-4 is multi-modal.

I noticed this in the original paper as well.

This probably means that they implemented multimodality the same way Palm-E did; starting with a pretrained LLM.

I got an auto-generated e-mail from openreview since the reviewer made an official comment below my answer, with the title of "[ICML 2023] Reviewer XXXX commented on your submission. Paper Number ...",

I don't personally think phenomenal consciousness is in principle required for any particular functional behavior at all - rather that phenomenal consciousness is tied to some causal profile which can be exploited in certain manners of implementations of certain kinds of functional organizations (possibly manners more accessible to biological evolution - although I maintain neutrality regarding if there are non-biological manners of realizing intelligent phenomenal consciousness). You can just have a system encode some variables that track preservation parameters and make an algorithm optimize/regulate it. It's not clear why it needs to have any phenomenal consciousness (like Nagel's what it is like) for that. I think the onus would be on the other side. It could be possible, that our physical reality is such that certain kind of computational realizations would end up creating certain kind of phenomenal consciousness but then that could be just an accidental feature of the actual world rather than some metaphysical necessity.

Thanks, but it seems completely unclear still. I will read it again.

Read the link at the tip of the thread.

So... Whats a plug in?

I don't know why anything would need to be conscious to engage in self preservation. We don't tend to think of plants, or viruses, or fungus, as having consciousness but they engage in pretty sophisticated self preservation behaviors. But then again, maybe these things do have a version of consciousness.

Either get access to the API, or buy the premium version of ChatGPT.

You can use 4-bit LLaMA 13B or 8-bit LLaMA 7B with the alpaca lora, both are very good. If you need help, this guide explains everything

How does one try out the 4th gen GPT?

People will be on chat gpt more than Google.

The branding Alone is worth it!

My suggestion is using 8 bit or 4 bit quantization. Also you can using automatic device mapping on Transformers that can offload partially to your CPU (warning : It use lots of System Memory [RAM]).

Finally got a response saying that you’re rebuttal adequately addressed my concerns. (Yet no change in the rating) 🥲 why do people do this?

[removed]