Recent comments in /f/Music

ImpendingSenseOfDoom t1_j9c6ira wrote

I think you bring up a lot of good points and it's probably some combination of all of that. I love DP, and they totally deserve the recognition that Zeppelin and Sabbath get for influencing hard rock and metal.

Someone else pointed out a lot of it has to do with the consistency of their albums. Zeppelin released 7 consecutive albums that were absolutely fucking incredible, and their last album is still probably as good as much of DP's work too. Same with Sabbath, their first 6 albums are all complete bangers. Deep Purple took a while to find their stride, their sound evolved a lot, and they had significant lineup changes that altered said sound through different periods.

While they have excellent work that spans several decades, I would say their best run of albums includes In Rock, Fireball, Machine Head and Burn. Note that Who Do We Think We Are came out during this time but I did not include it because I don't think it's as good, save for the song Woman From Tokyo which is a classic. Zeppelin and Sabbath did not have any clunkers during their peak runs. I think that's the difference.

1

Munchnie t1_j9c5iyn wrote

If you're alright with music in Spanish:

"Caramelos de Cianuro" I recommend "La casa" or "Veronica"

If not:

"Canvass The Town" and recommend "End up with nothing"

1

Competitive-Ad-498 t1_j9c5c5d wrote

Sorry, my reaction should have been on his reply. not yours.

He responds as if you wrote Queen never had any solid albums, but actually, you did not write that.

You state that Deep Purple and Queen had more great songs than they had solid albums. And i agree with that. Even In Rock and Machine Head had less good tracks on them. Some even very average.

1

Iskorka69 t1_j9c4pji wrote

I played classic guitar when I was a teen. I did memorise the music, but you’re not allowed to make mistakes when performing, unlike say rock music. Which is why I kept track of what I was playing during the performance. It also helps to distract your attention from the audience.

3

East-Ad-9078 t1_j9c2451 wrote

Interesting question. A lot of singers who are not technically brilliant are still great in the rock arena. If you do anything with enough conviction people will believe in it and being on the stage is a performance. All the worlds a stage and we are merely players. Rock hard my friend the audience will give their decision if you can hack it !

1

Ches909 t1_j9bxs6z wrote

Part of the issue is Blackmore himself. The guy distances himself so far from rock music into the 90's that their media presence was significantly reduced. Even though he wasn't in the band anymore a lot of these other artists thrived through the 90s doing interviews and touring as legacy artists. As a young first player during this time I loved Blackmore but rarely read an interview with him in guitar world or rolling Stone after the mid nineties. The rest of the band you barely heard about because they're elder statesman weren't there to push them as much. Unless you wanted to read about Blackmore's medieval music move they faded into more obscurity through the last couple decades.

All this being said absolutely loved seeing them at Live 8!

8