Recent comments in /f/Newark

sutisuc t1_iu9j83f wrote

It’s like half the people on this sub haven’t seen what happened to jersey city over the years. Couldn’t possibly build more in a city of that size over the last 20 years and it’s more unaffordable than ever. Why people want to price themselves out of Newark I have no idea. Maybe there’s more property owners on this sub than I’ve realized

10

surrealchemist t1_iu9irut wrote

Landlords and property owners don't make things look nice to make it nicer to live there. They make it nicer to justify charging the rent. If you just keep letting more and more in without any pushback then the other landlords are going to look at the market and start raising it as well because the whole average gets thrown out. Then it just spirals. There isn't much push back because people just see construction and new shiny things and think its good because it looks pretty and you can go to a starbucks or whatever.

9

TenzeFiyer t1_iu99yss wrote

I wouldn’t call them “rich”. Do they make more money? Yes! Nothing wrong with people coming in “buying” property to live in. When people purchase a property they take care of it. These are properties that the majority of Newark natives wouldn’t have purchased any ways because the majority of us are renters. I think newark residents rent at a staggering 80%. And with the new developments these are places where no one was living anyways. It’s empty lots that make the city look back. Taxes and costs of materials and maintenance are up. Let me ask you this; So should landlords do nothing to make those properties look better and function well just to keep the rents low? Or should they put money in thier investments to make the place livable and nice? But that do come at a cost which will cause rent to be higher. No one stays anywhere for long. People will have to move out eventually. It sucks but it’s the way it is. Hoboken and jersey city wasn’t always as nice as it was. Newark is next on that list. Areas change all the time. I’d like to see Newark in a much better light before I leave this earth. It would be a great thing to see Newark at its best.

7

Atuk-77 t1_iu98dxb wrote

Does replacing empty buildings count as gentrification? They are not displacing anyone, Gentrification is been used too widely, I’m against it when developers displace locals who live in a safe neighborhood but taking over empty buildings or crime infested areas is certainly a plus for the city as it bring new opportunities to locals.

14

WaltzThinking t1_iu956s3 wrote

Old buildings are a catch 22. They're beautiful but often need excessive maintenance, especially if neglected for a period of time like many buildings in Newark. Empty, deteriorating buildings are a real hazard. But a parking lot?! I hope that's not true. That's the last thing downtown needs. In fact, they desperately need infill mixed use development in place of all the existing parking lots downtown. Newark should be made a walkable city.

22

TenzeFiyer t1_iu8ukht wrote

A little gentrification is OK. If everyone is poor in the city, the city won’t generate enough taxes to keep things going and making a beautiful. This is coming from a guy who was born and raised here. I’m OK with a little gentrification because what has been happening for the majority of my life here in the city wasn’t working.

26

Towers_Oh_My27 OP t1_iu7wo4p wrote

yea, the building across was knocked down a few months ago. Luxury Rentals being built behind Fornos, condos across river Bank Park, the building where the clock on Ferry is just about finished with demo, and the building next to lexington ave finished its demo a while back. + Shaq's apartment complex in the BG is almost finished. It's crazy out here. hate to see it.

4