Recent comments in /f/Newark
twinkcommunist t1_iuavhdb wrote
Reply to comment by ahtasva in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
I'd support public housing but we don't have the tax system that existed post-war to fund it, and raising taxes enough to do so would be nearly politically impossible.
I don't think the idea that private developers are capable of lowering housing prices is actually discredited. New construction tends to be very expensive, but places that allow lots of building are overall cheaper than comparable places that don't. Upzoning slows rent growth in adjacent areas, and in some cases where it's done on a huge scale (like Sydney and Minneapolis) it actually has decreased overall rents.
eastaleph OP t1_iuaug5o wrote
Reply to comment by stephenclarkg in I might be a jerk sometimes but at least I don't hold up traffic for a shitty impromptu parade for diet Trump by eastaleph
Was unaware. Thanks for informing me.
ahtasva t1_iuatse2 wrote
Reply to comment by twinkcommunist in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
The answer is actually increased domestic spending on things that really create value for the people who live in this country. Large scale public housing being top on that list. The myth that private developers will resolve our housing crisis is a myth that has been so utterly discredit that one has to be borderline brain dead to continue to buy into it.
The entire sub-urban housing stock built in the post war building boom was heavily subsidized by the federal govt. But for those subsidies, the so called boomers would be just as broke as the melenials. No one talks about it in those terms today because the beneficiaries of those subsidies were almost exclusively white and today form the core of the neo liberal establishment.
The so-called progressives that are supposed to be challenging the establishment are now squarely co-opted; voting for war, increased military spending while ignoring the domestic crisis that plague their constituents.
stephenclarkg t1_iuatq5t wrote
Reply to I might be a jerk sometimes but at least I don't hold up traffic for a shitty impromptu parade for diet Trump by eastaleph
Bolsonaro is a war criminal
AgitatedAorta t1_iuasawl wrote
Reply to I might be a jerk sometimes but at least I don't hold up traffic for a shitty impromptu parade for diet Trump by eastaleph
They've been driving down Ferry honking their horns for the past half hour and I'm home sick with a cold and a splitting headache. FML
LateNightNewYork t1_iuaobci wrote
Reply to Coffee Cave - Halsey St by benavidesb1
It was very real! Great place along with Art Kitchen.
DrixxYBoat t1_iuak98c wrote
Reply to comment by TenzeFiyer in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
A city needs a prominent middle class in order for it to have a flourishing economy.
New developments attract this middle class.
The displacement of people is real and the rent increases aren't good, but we can't be a poor city just for the hell of it. Mars doesn't want to hire our citizens as they are now.
In order to stave off gentrification, Newarks school system must be stellar. A city with a good school system is a city that prepares its kids to graduate college and be able to work and play in the city.
benavidesb1 OP t1_iuajvyy wrote
Reply to comment by GhostOfRobertTreat in Coffee Cave - Halsey St by benavidesb1
Haha I’d love to have that spot back again
GhostOfRobertTreat t1_iuajtxr wrote
Reply to Coffee Cave - Halsey St by benavidesb1
Definitely had an unlicensed Corona there once. In a paper coffee cup.
benavidesb1 OP t1_iuailri wrote
Reply to comment by Ironboundian in Coffee Cave - Halsey St by benavidesb1
Thanks. This is awesome. That Coffee Cave space was so unique tho. Loved it. Even the way the two floors looked.
Ironboundian t1_iuaid4w wrote
Reply to Coffee Cave - Halsey St by benavidesb1
Yes it was great. But the guy who ran it is back and opening up a spot on Clinton avenue called BlkBoxNwk https://patch.com/new-jersey/newarknj/converted-building-gives-newark-artists-place-live-work
ryanov t1_iuabpks wrote
Reply to comment by Ironboundian in The broken window at Zaro’s is still boarded up, but covered with a tarp that sort of matches the rest of the storefront. by LateNightNewYork
Next time! Shit, that reminds me that I have a chocolate croissant sitting on the counter to eat! :-D
ryanov t1_iuabft1 wrote
Reply to comment by Atuk-77 in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
Why?
ryanov t1_iuabb2l wrote
Such a great mural on that one too.
twinkcommunist t1_iuaa0zo wrote
Reply to comment by surrealchemist in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
I'm fine with those other things if theres actually enough money behind any of them to actually get them built. Price caps usually have really bad second order effects. I don't think a vacancy tax would be useful because less than 6% of units in Newark are vacant which usually just means that landlords wait a month or two between tenants; things aren't sitting empty long term. (Especially in a city that has a lot of structures that aren't habitable but would count as vacant because they have walls and a roof). I'd rather just have a universal higher property tax that goes to a public housing developer that builds apartments to rent slightly above the cost of maintenance.
surrealchemist t1_iua95p2 wrote
Reply to comment by twinkcommunist in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
There are other types of housing though the city can encourage. Things like renter co-ops, low income units, non-profit housing. They can put caps on rent if they wanted. The recent push to put extra tax on vacant properties is good as well if it can prevent landlords from sitting on a unit to wait to replace it with a higher rent tenant.
twinkcommunist t1_iua8w58 wrote
Reply to comment by Towers_Oh_My27 in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
Owning houses you don't own only makes sense if property taxes are relatively low and you expect the price to keep going up forever. Prices are rising because despite the surge of construction, there isn't actually enough housing near jobs and transit for everyone who wants it. The empty luxury housing thing is mostly a myth but the solution is higher taxes and more constructuon.
twinkcommunist t1_iua7k15 wrote
Reply to comment by surrealchemist in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
This country has freedom of movement. You have no choice but to let as many in as want to move in. What you can control is whether enough new housing gets built to accommodate newcomers or if they have to compete with residents for existing homes.
ahtasva t1_iua1czg wrote
Reply to comment by Ironboundian in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
Even it if were, what’s wrong with that? You take a building with 4 units down and replace it with 40 units, that’s a 1000% increase in available rental units. The 20% affordable quota creates 8 affordable units. Assuming the 4 units lost were housing low income residents, those units have grown by 100%. How is this not a win all around.
16Vslave t1_iu9z01p wrote
People still went in there to eat? The building still up in the photo had to pre date the restaurant by a few decades. Sucks there will be a parking lot but would still prob be cheaper and environmentally friendly to knock down that old building with prob asbestos and lead in it then try rehab it.
I miss driving by the mirrored building that was where the parking lot is now,,,,was TAP airlines,iirc.
crustang t1_iu9xveb wrote
Reply to comment by sutisuc in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
Awful
funkyish t1_iu9wszm wrote
Reply to comment by Ironboundian in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
You're right that there's no limit for the temporary use, but I really think that with the push for redevelopment in the city and how well located this site is, it won't be too long before a new developer comes in. Perhaps I'm naive, but I don't see the parking lot remaining for another 10 years.
Ironboundian t1_iu9wp0i wrote
Reply to comment by Towers_Oh_My27 in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
It’s not gentrification if a building with a restaurant and apartments upstairs gets torn down to become commuter parking lot.
Ironboundian t1_iu9witl wrote
Reply to comment by funkyish in Another building bites the dust... gentrification is real out here. by Towers_Oh_My27
It won’t. There is no limit in the length of time of a temporary use” and it will be a parking lot as long as we have cars that don’t fly.
realspongesociety t1_iuax1qz wrote
Reply to I might be a jerk sometimes but at least I don't hold up traffic for a shitty impromptu parade for diet Trump by eastaleph
The traffic was unpleasant. The honking/shouting/generally trumpy signs were just antisocial.
What a bunch of arseholes.