Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania
TriVoMoto t1_j8eevwa wrote
Reply to comment by Southboundthylacine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
You crack me up bro
Southboundthylacine t1_j8edp7l wrote
Reply to comment by TriVoMoto in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
And yet here you are replying
TriVoMoto t1_j8edfr5 wrote
Reply to comment by Southboundthylacine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
You still mad, bro? This was 8 hours ago — I’ve moved on with my life since then 😂
Southboundthylacine t1_j8ed90c wrote
Reply to comment by TriVoMoto in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
I think your ass might be missing a word in that sentence
adult1990 t1_j8ecpl4 wrote
Reply to comment by thesbaine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
I would like to apply to be on this team full time
Allemaengel t1_j8ebweh wrote
Reply to comment by flaaaacid in I want to hear about your experiences and thoughts by CloverrFields
You entirely missed my point.
It's not that there's vacation housing. Duh, I know that. It's the sheer amount of it bought by relatively high-income out-of-staters as a percentage of all housing stock that doesn't leave much for lower-paid locals, especially those in the service sector jobs that support the tourism.
Housing insecurity represents a real issue here and in tourist areas throughout the country.
raven4747 t1_j8ea77y wrote
Reply to comment by Weary_Ad7119 in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
really? the federal level only encompasses 50 states, i guess its not that different.. /s
25Bam_vixx t1_j8e8web wrote
No, you went to a third party site. It should be gov not com. Third party site comes up first and you have to go down to search to see the gov site. Basically it’s dmv gov something pa
Weary_Ad7119 t1_j8e8ukz wrote
Reply to comment by thesbaine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
A 6 million dollar a year CMS with integrations is pretty common at the federal level. I don't think the economics would change that much at the state level for a critical site 🤷♂️.
thesbaine t1_j8e89s8 wrote
Reply to comment by Weary_Ad7119 in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
Breakdown time:
In 2019 there were just over 9,000,000 licensed drivers in PA. Assuming about 50% renewed online, and assuming an even spread over 4 years, you're talking 1,250,000 renewing per year online. That's $6,750,000 per year.
There's no way that the SLA, maintenance, hardware costs, and plugins cost that per year alone. If it does, going back to an initial statement, something is very, very wrong.
jpop237 t1_j8e7psh wrote
9,119,280 licensed drivers in PA
@ $6 per renewal
= $54,715,680.
Who runs the 3rd party payment processing companies and how are they connected to our politicians?
Weary_Ad7119 t1_j8e6tkx wrote
Reply to comment by thesbaine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
You need to maintain the site and the interoperability, paying for the SLA, etc. The payment processing integration must be maintained. Not the service itself.
NotTRYINGtobeLame t1_j8e03le wrote
Reply to comment by whomp1970 in Voting Rights Victory in Pennsylvania by susinpgh
But I'm not just technically correct. All this anger and vitriol spewed here at me hasn't proved that there is any noteworthy proportion of the GOP who wants these extremes. Hence why they're called extremists. If y'all are going to blanket label the other party anything without truly paying attention, while shoving so much hate into their arguments where it just isn't, then I can't help you folks. Clearly, the reactionary and immature "everyone is Nazis" is going to win out with the Reddit crowd, and no matter how many times I ask for proof of the allegations, none is provided, only "you should know," and, "You're just blind/ignorant," etc. If the Right wing failed to provide evidence as much as the Left in this post, they'd be crucified by the Left. Someone tried to show me 1 article about DuPont being evil and man was it a long read, but all it showed is that Dupont is a big, rich scummy lobbying company. When I tried to analyze the article, no one wants to play ball because they can't have their positions challenged when the almighty Reddit up-vote count is egging them on.
Patiod t1_j8dyixi wrote
Reply to comment by NotTRYINGtobeLame in Voting Rights Victory in Pennsylvania by susinpgh
Positioning all Democrats as pedophile "groomers" and child abusers sets gullible conservatives/Christians into a mindset where they need to "save the children" by killing Democrats. If you don't think this speech inspires murder, just look at the Comet Pizza debacle.
It's not binary: "Nazi" or "not-Nazi" - you don't get to Full Nazi overnight. I totally get your concern about cheapening the word "nazi" but there's value in warning people that we seem to be on a similar track to Germany in the 30s.
LurkersWillLurk t1_j8dx31v wrote
There's not enough supply for housing in New York compared to demand, so people are moving to PA and essentially the same thing is happening all over again. Zoning laws artificially restrict the supply of housing and drive prices upward. People who want housing to be affordable but aren't willing to ever see their property values go down are holding a fundamentally impossible position.
whomp1970 t1_j8dvm04 wrote
Reply to comment by NotTRYINGtobeLame in Voting Rights Victory in Pennsylvania by susinpgh
Man, I get it. Really, I get what you're trying to say.
But just like "Kleenex" now means tissues (rather than just one brand of tissues) and "Google it" means "use a search engine" (even if you use Bing) ...
I think "Nazi" has lost its specificity. It now literally means "someone exercising authority with evil intentions", or something else generic like that.
Railing against that change in word usage will do you no good.
It's like, technically, you're correct, but nobody cares and everyone understands what the intent was.
[deleted] t1_j8dvbdq wrote
Reply to comment by choodudetoo in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
[removed]
Zenith2017 t1_j8dun9b wrote
Turns out that landlords are shitty people - who could've known!?
TheBrianiac t1_j8dtarx wrote
Make sure you are on the PennDOT official website, penndot.pa.gov or dmv.pa.gov. There are many impersonation sites online that will gladly take your money and not renew your license/registration.
arkol3404 t1_j8dscne wrote
Reply to comment by artificialavocado in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
Yore not funny.
thesbaine t1_j8drxos wrote
Reply to comment by Weary_Ad7119 in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
If y'all have teams of people maintaining a payment system then something is very, very wrong.
[deleted] t1_j8dqp1o wrote
Reply to Voting Rights Victory in Pennsylvania by susinpgh
[removed]
flaaaacid t1_j8dpm0r wrote
Reply to comment by Allemaengel in I want to hear about your experiences and thoughts by CloverrFields
An area marketed as a vacation destination contains vacation housing? This is my shocked face.
Weary_Ad7119 t1_j8dox9v wrote
Reply to comment by thesbaine in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
They have to pay teams to maintain the payment system. It does need a minimal amount of integration and maintenance to keep it up to date.
Weary_Ad7119 t1_j8efim5 wrote
Reply to comment by raven4747 in PennDOT charges $6 more for online license renewal? by exhilaration
But the complexity doesn't scale with users. Sure you might have more AWS or Azure costs, but you are still left with the complexity of a CMS with multiple integrations. You still going to need an SLA/support comparible with any federal run CMS. It might be even harder depending on budgets around supporting services.