Recent comments in /f/RhodeIsland

PigpenMcKernan t1_j46gw2d wrote

I believe he came to them unsolicited. The just giving away for what will likely be an eyesore full of luxury condos is what bothers me.

Study after study shows that this type of project does nothing for the overall housing stock and sustainability. The developer can just pay extra fees or fines and not include the number of planned “affordable” units.

The state needs to focus on building housing for low and middle income families, that’s what is needed.

12

OrdersFriesEveryTime t1_j46fshx wrote

Not opposed to more housing, and completely agree that they should be building up and not out. It sucks that we’ll lose the park, but this is a city.

That said, how much are these apartments going to rent for? Not expecting Section 8 but if they cut into a middle class single or more household income by more than 30% (relative to unit size) then they’re useless. Obviously it’s going to be something like starting at one bedroom for 2500 a month.

The building is fucking ugly and (still) looks like an oscillating fan.

1

tru3no t1_j46ff1j wrote

F*ck affordable housing... lets rich people move in and spend money in town and pay the ridiculously high taxes we pay... build affordable housing outside of the downtown Providence.... Pawtucket, Central Falls, Johnston, Cranston all this can used the affordable housing you talk..

9

gusterfell t1_j46f0dq wrote

The lot it's on has always been zoned for development. It is adjacent to the park but not legally part of it. If Fane doesn't get built there, something else will.

As for the views, they could've said the same about the Superman building when it was built, and the Turk's Head before that. It's a valid reason to make sure the design is as aesthetically sound as possible, but not to kill the project outright.

11

talazia t1_j46ez2h wrote

i have always had an odd fear and dislike of gas stoves and when we rehabbed this old house we capped the gas lines and put in electric -- our construction team did it, but we had to tell National Grid at the time.

Two years later we had to call them because there was a leak on our street. If we had kept them we would have had to replace all the lines to our house.

2

quinntronix OP t1_j46e7wb wrote

This will not be affordable housing. If the city just maintains the park it could open a seasonal outdoor concert venue and generate more income. The trickle down effect for our economy isn’t as beneficial as a tax free construction project for a luxury condo building.

−4

Man_of_Aluminum t1_j46dxyl wrote

My opinion is we should be shitting out projects of this size whenever and wherever possible and if I hear one more NIMBY dipshit bitch about "neighborhood character" or "keep [x major city] under [x feet]" to hold up any and all development I'm going to blow a gasket.

46

PigpenMcKernan t1_j46dlr5 wrote

We need more housing in the state. This tower isn’t really the answer.

Besides that, Fane doesn’t have experience with a project of this scale and he is getting a sweetheart deal for some seriously prime property.

The City can and should look for better from elsewhere.

40

quinntronix OP t1_j46cy1z wrote

This project is for luxury housing, not affordable housing (there’s no shortage of luxury condos). The project and developers are probably getting away tax free for decades like most developers in town. In 5-10 years the people who live there will pay taxes and shop at restaurants yay!

−16

Actual_Heart7266 t1_j46cj80 wrote

Newport day on your way out go up Aquidneck and stop at Ragged Island Brewery and then go up to Bristol and stop at Pivotal Brewing and grab dinner at Brick Pizza (also honorable mentions to three other Bristol breweries: Six Pack, Vigilant and Twelve Guns) you’ll have to drive up and back over to Warwick or return back down the island, but totally worth it IMO!

1