Recent comments in /f/RhodeIsland

KennyWuKanYuen t1_jcm44yr wrote

Reply to Looking for a Place to Open a Coffee Shop by OutlandishnessNo7283

This may seem a little off kilter since I can’t think of any locations at the moment, however; have you considered maybe a food truck-style coffee shop? If not, I’ll just plant the seed in your mind.

But I was thinking maybe West End, but that’s also in Providence. In EP, you could try by city hall or the HS, but those areas seem too busy for good foot traffic. Most places that come to mind for a good coffee shop are in Providence, either near the East Side or downtown, but all of that goes against your stipulations. :/

2

Proof-Variation7005 t1_jcm0wln wrote

Reply to INVESTIGATION: Mike Mota and the art of the Virtual Con by rhodyjourno

There's a lot to unpack here so I just am going to ramble about the insanity of fucking "Gotti 2: The Final Chapter, Facts Undisputed"

Like, if you think the TV movie from 25 years ago deserved to be redone, you don't need to call it a sequel. And even if you do want to make to something that ended with the titular character going to prison for life, why does it have a sub-title that sounds like it was written by Michael Scott?

4

RIDG86 t1_jclzzpg wrote

Reply to comment by Beezlegrunk in The failure of Providence’s Fane tower is a lesson in politics and reality by Beezlegrunk

I got to tell you, as I began to read this I thought your tone was going to be snippy with the whole entitled to have opinions versus having opinions…..but reading your whole reply I am going to revisit that first impression as you simply trying to be particularly thoughtful in your reply, and I can appreciate that.

Just to push back on your eventual point in the first paragraph, i never said both of our opinions are equally valid, just that we are both entitled to have an opinion. I will maintain that is true. In fact, I know I am bias, but I give my own opinion more weight than yours. And I do not hold it against you if you do the same with you own opinion on this subject!

The whole reason I made that statement was to acknowledge that we hit an impasse. I am not going change your mind and your weren’t going to change mine.

I will say that I do read his newsletter, I used to follow his PVD Facebook page that he had going before going to the Globe. (Not even sure if that is still maintained). That is all to say, that over a better part of a decade I have been reading McGowan articles. I will acknowledge that he does use sport analogies from time to time, but I do not see it as much as a problem as you seem to do. Moreover, given that he cover politics more than anything else, I cant think of what politics translates more perfectly into than sports. Elections are races, candidates are judged by their performance by the electorate, votes like points determine the winner. Some candidates, like sports teams, are better funded than others. And like in sports everyone loves a good underdog story line.

In any event, pure objectivity in journalism is a myth. I am not even sure what that would look like. Even with a plain reporting of the facts, I find folks who do not like what they are hearing would question the objectivity of not contextualizing those facts in a way that they subjectively believe is needed. In this instance, if reporters questioned the financing without any basis that it does or does not exist….that would not sound too objective to me if I were supporting the tower...

As far as digging up the Fane financing, or lack thereof, thats an unfair expectation. Fane had every reason not to publish that information for business reasons. Short of that, as far as I know the Fourth Estate does not have subpoena powers.

Again good talk. This is my last reply friend, I leave you to have the last word if you so desire it!

1