Recent comments in /f/RhodeIsland

spokchewy t1_je4hu17 wrote

What’s wrong with a defensive battle? They can be really exciting. Maybe the goalies put on a show, maybe the woodwork is hit multiple times. Regardless, there were 38 goals in MLS last Saturday so if you really need goals, there are plenty. And, the games are over in under 2 hours and there are no commercial breaks aside from halftime.

1

Beezlegrunk t1_je3v0me wrote

Sort of like saying, "Don't hate slave-owners, hate slavery as an institution. Free labor is desirable. Capitalism."

Doesn't sound so great when it's applied to something that we as a society (eventually) decided was morally indefensible. And forcing people to be wage slaves so they can pay 30%+ of their income for housing is indefensible, especially if the reason is just to enrich other people at their expense (literally and figuratively).

Slave-owners perpetuated slavery — they weren't powerless "players" in a "game" they didn't control or were forced to play, they benefitted from it and wanted it to continue. Just like you do.

Eventually we fought a long and bloody war that ended the formal system of human exploitation called slavery. So hate the player and the game — and especially players who try to pretend they're not the reason the game is still being played ...

−1

101955Bennu OP t1_je3uiss wrote

I think that’s significant hyperbole. I’ve had to be seen in the emergency room twice in the last year at Miriam and was seen in under an hour both times. I also hardly think a privately owned hospital shutting down without negotiating with the city or state or following proper procedure of notifying the state boards before closing departments can be equated with building a soccer stadium, and frankly I don’t see how they’re related, considering a hospital was never an alternative competing proposal. We just love soccer, we love the team, and we want to share our excitement and hopefully get other people excited, too. If it’s not for you, it’s not for you, but we’re gonna be there cheering either way!

3

fishythepete t1_je3u1b9 wrote

So sales are down 20% from this time last year, so mark that down on the demand side.

Consider that the jump in interest rates over the last 9 months means that your mortgage and interest expense (ie the bulk of your mortgage payment) has almost doubled for homes priced the same. I.e. buying a $400,000 home today costs you about 80% more than it did a year ago. And home prices haven’t stayed flat either. The cost to own a given home is > 2.5-3X today what it was 3 years ago. But hey maybe demand is unlimited no matter the cost.

Simple though right 🙄

−7

Mountain_Bill5743 t1_je3s46w wrote

I'm not telling people to wait, this isn't 2007. I'm simply stating that your comment about what happened during the Great Recession here is at best misinformed and at worst completely dismissive of the suffering that people went through here in 2007 well into the 2010s.

Here's from when RI was in the top 10 worst list for underwater mortgages (published in 2012): https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/5-states-drowning-underwater-mortgages-flna436089

The original article is no longer available but this snippet covers a bit of the challenge "Some of the states with a high percentage of underwater mortgages had economic problems long before the recent recession. States such as Michigan and Rhode Island have experienced long-term industrial declines for some time. In these areas, drops in home values were only accelerated by the recession."

4