Recent comments in /f/Showerthoughts
MeeperX OP t1_j26uqpu wrote
Reply to comment by McBarbieQ in Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
Depending on where they exist being an npc comes with the benefit of being truly unkillable or the curse of dying over and over again for all of time.
MiasmaFate OP t1_j26up1k wrote
Reply to comment by togocann49 in $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
I love it. You did the math.
I find it amazing how it all adds up but we tend to thing in years not hours or days.
[deleted] OP t1_j26un1l wrote
Reply to Your skeleton is always wet. by [deleted]
[removed]
McBarbieQ t1_j26ufpg wrote
Reply to comment by MeeperX in Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
But why would the NPCs want to do that? The whole point of being an NPC is to avoid parties and all that needless murder-hoboing.
I’m starting to think that NPCs are the truly OP ones. ;)
togocann49 t1_j26u6m0 wrote
Reply to $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
If you work 50 weeks a year, 5 days/week, and 8 hours a day, you need to earn $50/hour an $400/day to make $100 000/year. Also under this line of thinking, every 25 cents earned per hour nets you $500/year and every dollar earns you $2000/year. I always found this a quick way to figure out yearly pay from hourly, and vice versa
[deleted] t1_j26u6cl wrote
Reply to $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j26u3sy wrote
[removed]
MeeperX OP t1_j26tsgq wrote
Reply to comment by McBarbieQ in Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
Because if the could they'd be upgraded to party member.
McBarbieQ t1_j26tn8z wrote
Reply to comment by MeeperX in Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
How do you know?
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j26tgkg wrote
Reply to comment by wildadragon in There are no ambidextrous people, only people living in denial of their disability. by Ophiomancy_Xaxax
You're such a tool. It wasn't a literal statement, as I've already explained to you. Also, the rules for the posts on this sub literally state that is for things thought of while staring blankly at a wall, and you're in here critiquing me for not having sound formal logical argument, and for having not read a study on hand dominance. Get the fuck outta here. It makes perfect sense. All the people who can't use one hand are disabled, but they instead call the people who have two functional hands "ambidextrous". Then you wanted to nitpick about preference vs aversion and all sorts of other nonsense.
The fact that this post is even up and wasn't removed is testament to the fact that it was sufficiently stupid in the correct way for the sub, which you keep confusing for the American Medical Association sub.
MiasmaFate OP t1_j26tboe wrote
Reply to comment by 603ahill in $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
I added that in the extra bit. Not the actual shower thought but wanted to account for the way we work.
MeeperX OP t1_j26tajg wrote
Reply to comment by McBarbieQ in Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
None of which they can ever use 😅
CostAccomplished1163 t1_j26t63q wrote
Reply to There is no nice way of asking someone if they had trouble hearing what you said by ArsonBjork
"Did you have any trouble hearing what I said" would work I think. In my experience any social situation can be improved if you're willing to increase how weird you'll let yourself be
603ahill t1_j26t2ua wrote
Reply to $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
Well, we're talking wages, so not everyday is a work day. Therefore if you figure most work 250 days a year that is about 400.00 a day.
McBarbieQ t1_j26t26x wrote
Reply to Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
But NPCs get to just stand around, repeat a handful of stock lines, and might even have access to an infinite supply of quest rewards. They’re living the dream.
Ground2ChairMissile t1_j26su0w wrote
Reply to comment by cruiserman_80 in The 1984 Dune film makes a lot more sense if The Spice is referred to as Space Cocaine instead. by neoengel
Space-Time Cocaine.
Wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey weed.
[deleted] t1_j26ssor wrote
Reply to There is no nice way of asking someone if they had trouble hearing what you said by ArsonBjork
[removed]
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j26srrh wrote
Reply to comment by tomatocucumber in There are no ambidextrous people, only people living in denial of their disability. by Ophiomancy_Xaxax
Right. You don't think not being able to use one hand to any reasonable degree would qualify as being partially disabled? As in, "ambidextrous" just means you're normal and both hands function, while it should be everybody else who gets stuck with a label for having a hand they can barely use.
ind3pend0nt t1_j26srom wrote
Reply to comment by david_leaves in Ever wonder if anyone else on the globe was ever watching the same exact show at the same timestamp by Double-Working1990
I seriously doubt any streaming service, outside of live events, have any data to determine if two unique users meet that criteria. If they do then that would be a sell story for marketing/sales. Showing how many eyes are glued to Netflix.
[deleted] t1_j26srcc wrote
[removed]
Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j26spv7 wrote
Reply to $100,000/yr is less then $275 a day. by MiasmaFate
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
Ophiomancy_Xaxax OP t1_j26skym wrote
Reply to comment by MinniesWorld in There are no ambidextrous people, only people living in denial of their disability. by Ophiomancy_Xaxax
Perhaps it was poorly written. As I attempted to clarify, it is the non-ambidextrous people who are essentially disabled. The ambidextrous label is completely unnecessary, because you are supposed to be able to use both of your hands.
Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j26sgox wrote
Reply to Calling someone an NPC is the cruelest level of calling someone basic. You're basically saying they are artificial without intelligence. by MeeperX
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
highxv0ltage OP t1_j26uuua wrote
Reply to comment by sysnickm in SUV’e are the new minivans, yet it’s still cool to own an SUV. by highxv0ltage
Some forget. Then, they complain about how expensive it is to fill up.