I’m just looking forward to the fact they can’t add fart cans to the back

From 0 to 1.

Your Google search didn't work.

Your evidence failed.

Thank you for finally agreeing with me.

Sometimes you just need to check it out for yourself and learn something new.

So don't think that you are a moron or an idiot. We all start from scratch.

yet pi is a number.

checkmate, atheists.

Yeah I was just trying to lighten the mood, sorry

[removed]

Shhhh!! Don't mention the radio

again you could just google this. I am done, please feel free to leave this convo thinking you are right. you should even tell a bunch of people about how big an idiot I am... please also tell them about this concept and why I am a moron.

Sure.

The .25 in 2.25 is the quotient of from 2 to 3 (1). 2+.25

Also, 2.25 is the quotient of 45 ÷ 2 or 45/2.

However, the OP said from 0 to 1, this is where my argument lies.

There are NOT the same amount of numbers from 0 to 1 as there are 0 to infinity.

There ARE the same number of ELEMENTS.

[removed]

Please, I drink the most piss. I guzzle piss straight from the source.

[removed]

Try imagining nothing (darkness doesn’t count because that’s still a color so it’s still something). You can’t because you’re unable to experience “nothing”. Same with blindness but for sight.

yeah clearly the set of rational numbers consists of almost no numbers. /s

From youur source:

An infinite set (e.g. integers) and an infinite proper subset of the set (e.g. natural numbers) can have the same number of elements. In fact, all the following infinite sets have the same number of elements: natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, even numbers, odd numbers, prime numbers, etc."

Elements, not numbers.

There are the same number of elements between 0 and 1 and 0 and infinity, not NUMBERS.

This man said "they can't outswim me if I drink at the water."

Uh...you know part of learning how to swim is to learn how NOT to drink the water right?

I'm saying they are two different quotients of the same number.

not to me. to everyone on earth.

​

my source is actually just my basic high school level education. but if you need a different one.

https://www.cantorsparadise.com/number-of-numbers-infinite-weirdness-9387faa58368

here is a link. let me know if you want thousands more. or just google it.. or ask anyone with a brain.

A number is an arithmetic value used to represent quantity, fractions are quotients of theses quantities.

Does it extends to number above 1? 2.25 and 2.75 are not different number?

[removed]

To you.

Again you're arguing on shower thoughts, and if you want to be an incorrect smug ass while doing so that's your right.

Again feel free to provide your source as I have looked it up and I am still representing the concept accurately.

Please provide evidence for you claim

Strawman, equivocation fallacy.

lemme try.

for every x in R such that 1 < x < infty, there is exactly one number (1/x) in R, s.t. 0 < (1/x) < 1.

also vice versa.

there's a bijection between the two sets, therefore they are the same size.

am i missing something?

Everything was black n white until my parents were 30 idk what you’re talking about