Recent comments in /f/Showerthoughts
mufasa329 t1_j29z0mw wrote
Reply to Ever wonder if anyone else on the globe was ever watching the same exact show at the same timestamp by Double-Working1990
Happens with literally any live show, Super Bowl, jeopardy, it’s very very common
KorGgenT t1_j29yx53 wrote
The thing that's burning wouldn't make the sound without fire
Watercanbecoldorhot t1_j29yu3p wrote
One thing I always think about is that my cat probably think I’m weird when I watch tv
alukyane t1_j29ys77 wrote
Reply to comment by Aki_The_Ghost in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
They were joking about 2 going to infinity...
Road_Warrior86 t1_j29ynaa wrote
Big cardiology owns most of the fast food places. It’s a conspiracy.
eternalankh t1_j29yku1 wrote
Reply to comment by Manspunk in Pets don’t know we can communicate silently with texts by TIFUstorytime
To be fair, we do know that.
Aki_The_Ghost t1_j29yjfr wrote
Reply to comment by alukyane in There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity. by Resinate1
We need to know what a limit is. It is the value that some variable approaches but never reaches if one of their parameters approaches a certain point. Example : When X approaches but never quite reaches 0, X^2 approaches but never quite reaches 0. It's the limit of x going to 0 for X^2 . The Limit. A limit implies the constant movement of some variable towards a certain point. So we NEED to talk about X, or a variable of any kind, if we want to calculate a limit. He just said the number 2, a constant number, not a variable, we can't work with it.
[deleted] t1_j29ygog wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
dashinny t1_j29ydun wrote
That’s expecting the majority who normally eat fast food can afford a cardiologist
[deleted] t1_j29yb0z wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j29y9ml wrote
[deleted] t1_j29y7dl wrote
[removed]
Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j29y17b wrote
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
[deleted] t1_j29y0gn wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
No_Obligation_264 t1_j29xq9v wrote
Reply to comment by Amoniakas in A club is a networking event for sex by Existing-Ad6404
That's for books🤪🤣
[deleted] t1_j29xh03 wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
drainisbamaged t1_j29xba1 wrote
Reply to comment by Suspicious-Notice-98 in The universe is ~20% smaller for a 6ft person versus a 5ft person by hanauma_view
The OP speaks relatively while you're speaking absolutely. Maybe you've misunderstood what was said?
At that..you don't freeze frame the universe, that's not how the simulator works. This is same concept as the coastline paradox. It's not just about making everything stop while you grab a tape measurer
YeetusFeetus1269 t1_j29x8l2 wrote
Im Romania and i've seen that pizzeria but never tried it and now in curious about it
[deleted] t1_j29x3jk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j29wvgg wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j29wu98 wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]
Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j29wcye wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
[deleted] t1_j29wax7 wrote
Suspicious-Notice-98 t1_j29w630 wrote
Reply to comment by drainisbamaged in The universe is ~20% smaller for a 6ft person versus a 5ft person by hanauma_view
That's why it would need to be measured with a standardized tool. You can't take a 5 ft something and a 6 ft something, measure the universe with both and then say that since it takes less 6 ft things than 5 ft things than the universes size is smaller or bigger.
Yes the universe is expanding, but if you pick a point in time, you'd have to measure it with one object to determine it's size based on that object and then you'd be able to define it's size which then wouldn't be any different for the other objects on it. Just because one object perceives the size to be different, doesn't mean that it actually is.
[deleted] t1_j29z1y5 wrote
Reply to Before 'was' was 'was', 'was' was 'is'. by Thay_Guy
[removed]