[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

Only on very short occasions and happen at least a couple times per game. It's handled by more hands than feet, so handoval!

[removed]

I don't Murican football much, but I know they kick it sometimes. Gotta kick it between the two metal sticks.

Yeah! I actually played sports/gym and sometimes read books (mainly indoor) in my free time, but this won’t take the whole day. Especially during holidays/day off, I’m left with plenty of time not knowing what to do.

I guess I gotta start looking into some other outdoor activities.

Exactly the first thing I thought of when I read this post

That's a tough spot to be in! Maybe it's time to find something new that'll bring you some joy and fill in the gaps between work. Anything from a hobby to a side hustle - the options are endless, so take your pick and make the most of your free time.

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

And the counter argument would be as long as humans kill/hate each other for shits and giggles the species merely survives instead of thriving

It's animalistic is what it is. To rise above that is what is human.

I do think football is the proper name for a soccer ball though

Unless there's an equally tall building next door and when you're done look out the window and see multiple people in their windows watching

if i was ravenously lonely, i'd pay for a prostitute, since i can easily afford one...
but i won't because if i did that id be.... an idiot....

Exactly! For a ball that has any relation with a foot on a short and small occasion that only happens a couple times a game at least, it sure is handled by hands more. I think it should be called the handoval, cause it's oval shaped and spheres aren't oblong

men paying for a prostitute are paying for companionship, men are more than capable of gratifying their own sexual urges for free, so the X factor here is companionship not sex, which you get more of for cheaper in a marriage,

however if your argument is that you do not need women and that paying a higher price for less time is cheaper in the long run,all i will say to that is that men in general are very lonely and depressed without women.

Yeah should be called handball

[deleted]

You'll certainly get more time together with a spouse, but it might be more than you need, and it's not all quality time. If you pay only for the time you need, a Relationship As A Service model (RAAS) could save you money, compared to in-house hosting, but that depends on your personal use case.

What were they thinking?? Feeding us these blatant lies?! It has no feet, where is there any ball?

[deleted]

you could make that argument, and thats a valid argument, however you'd need to factor in the time spent (both sexual and non sexual) with your partner and average it out to an hourly wage, then id say on average its cheaper for the man to be married

[removed]

Oh actually i see your talking about the other football my bad yeah who knows what they were thinking