You could just crash your own funeral

[removed]

Well, if you are someone who is certified to write one as well as a physician who can designate the cause of death, fill it out with cause of death being gunshot wound to the head, make the time of death a minute after you sign it, and then follow through, you will have seen it.

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

Touché

I’ve seen something similar to this before, like some are under the impression you have to buy the whole bag. They’re weighed at checkout, I take what I need, don’t think I’ve ever bought a entire bag. Maybe I would if my household weren’t grape snobs, but you don’t have to.

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

Guess I’m a pussy, that was some weird shit ( pun intended)

More like girls are unlucky that we pee streams, cuz if we didn't we'd have to sit like they do and the seat debate would be no more

I would rather see that than my obituary if I was an asshole all my life and knew it.

I believe that’s why the Nobel prize was invented.

Nobel saw his premature obituary and said “fuck that. I’m not being remembered as an arms dealer”

My bf says only pussies lock the door

“Even a broken clock is right twice a day” - Batman

I disagree. Hadn't thought of it until just now.

Been weeks at least otherwise.

Which reminds me I wanted to watch the newest Batman.

Thanks!

[removed]

But wait, in the event of one sensing danger isn’t that triggered by stimuli picked up via the brain? It seems like the heart is the second step in this process.

I’m not sure this is true. But I’m literally watching the dark knight movie right now on Netflix. So you’re at least right about me, for at least today.

I never want the idea of Mist Mode Piss to ever cross my mind again

At some point you will exhaust the quantity of people that have a mutually exclusive set of ancestors to your own, thus the child from any union will have some small portion of ancestors that are on both sides of the family tree. Could it be argued that due to the increased likelihood of males being in the category where they are an ancestor to both the mother and father that OP correct?

Lol, OP could be right because incest

[removed]

Yeah I guess so, but I’ve been unlucky with like 3 of my thoughts in a row. It’s probably my fault but I don’t think they’re as bad as people are making them out to be. I know that they’re not 100% accurate to everybody, but that’s hard to do anyway.

Or you and your thoughts just don’t really fit into the expectations of what people want other people posting here? That’s also a possibility, right? 👀😂

Who the fuck thinks it’s okay to “taste” grapes at the grocery store?

[removed]