Recent comments in /f/Washington
MoiJaimeLesCrepes t1_j5s9et0 wrote
Reply to comment by VGSchadenfreude in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
I agree with the principle. not sure that a state-wide mandate is the way to go about it. feels... ham-fisted.
VGSchadenfreude t1_j5s989o wrote
Reply to comment by MoiJaimeLesCrepes in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
We honestly need more density in the cities, especially for people who can’t drive and who can’t live in the multi-story townhomes currently being built.
VGSchadenfreude t1_j5s9413 wrote
Reply to comment by Yarvard in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Why can’t we have both…?
forgiveangel t1_j5s93lo wrote
Anyone know the orgs behind this push that got it considered to being pushed into a bill?
MoiJaimeLesCrepes t1_j5s90f0 wrote
Reply to comment by cusmilie in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
yeah, that's precisely it, except no McMansions, but condos or apartment buildings instead. In order to make a profit, the developers will have to up the prices. Nothing comes in cheap. That much sudden density will cause traffic jams on roads not designed to take in that many cars, but maybe, decades later, the public transit infrastructure will become developed enough to help.
​
At best, I see this as a heavy-handed attempt to force the cities and suburbs to densify, but it'll come with a lot of pain for the next 15, 20 years.
Hondaccord t1_j5s8lth wrote
Reply to comment by tipsup in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Nope! It’s been heard in committee and is eligible to be voted on in committee.
MoiJaimeLesCrepes t1_j5s8fcp wrote
Reply to comment by Theotar in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
it's really unclear that this would pass. It's an attempt to force higher density new constructions in urban environments.
I haven't heard of state-wide mandates for higher housing density.
In my opinion, densifying is not a bad thing, but the infrastructure isn't necessarily made to support it, so this could cause a lot of really bad traffic jams.
I can also see that people will go further and further out to get the single family homes they crave causing more exoburbs and suburban sprawl.
so, I applaud the sentiment, but I doubt that the measure will pass, and, if it does, that this won't generate a lot of problems.
Theotar t1_j5s81oy wrote
Reply to comment by DoserMcMoMo in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Thank you for helping me out! Wonder if this might lead to slowing down housing inflation a bit.
gopac56 t1_j5s7wph wrote
Link social security numbers to homes, 1 per until we get shit figured out.
MoiJaimeLesCrepes t1_j5s7qxx wrote
if it passes, that sounds like a whole lot of condos and apartment buildings for cities, and a whole lot of people moving out further and further to get the single family housing they want...
[deleted] t1_j5s7n2t wrote
Reply to comment by DoserMcMoMo in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
[deleted]
Theotar t1_j5s7dqv wrote
Reply to comment by Chronfidence in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
My adhd, dyslexia, and covid brain fog make it a challenge. Reall helps if I can get my fellow Reddit users to help out by doing a brief description for me.
[deleted] t1_j5s67sn wrote
Reply to comment by DoserMcMoMo in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
[deleted]
up_down_underwater t1_j5s2ldx wrote
Reply to comment by brilliant_beast in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Free market? And I’d love to see your equation of how this will “drive up the prices of single family homes” ?
compurunner t1_j5s27al wrote
Reply to comment by cusmilie in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
That...sounds good? Having a yard is fine, but there are so many people that don't need one and are willing to give it up for other things.
DoserMcMoMo t1_j5s205z wrote
Reply to comment by Theotar in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
From what I gather, some areas have too many houses, but not enough livable area to meet demand. So instead of building houses (single family residence), they would build a small apartment that could home four- to- six families in a similar footprint. That's the ELI5 of it
dubzi_ART t1_j5rzq6b wrote
Reply to comment by HillyFellow in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
I just applied for a place like this in Tacoma, it’s brand new and sensible.
ChildhoodExternal962 t1_j5rzgye wrote
Reply to comment by Capable_Nature_644 in Name change on drivers license. Can I get a new photo? by beautifuldisaster425
You are required to take a new one.
cusmilie t1_j5rxvrs wrote
Look at what happened in Kirkland if you think this will fix the issue. The Cottage housing inventory was passed to allow homes to be able to build multiple homes on a lot in order to increase housing and make it more affordable. What’s been happening (1) starter home are being torn down for McMansions. I’ve seen a perfectly fine move in rambler bought for $1.25. The developers split the lot in half, built a McMansion on one half with no yard for $3.2 mil and trying to sell other lot for $1.35. (2) home continuously being built on smaller and smaller lots. The homes have virtually no yard and start at $1.2mil +. (3) homes being built in crazy space where they should be built. I literally saw a home for sale for $1.4mil with a home literally in its front year that’s $1.2mil.
So developers are just squishing more and more homes into smaller lots and causing land values to go through the roof so an average family can’t afford anything in the area, even fixer upper starter homes.
doktorhladnjak t1_j5rxd6w wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Much better to have the govt tell you what you can and can’t do with your land /s
agutema t1_j5ruevt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Damn liberals and their... wanting to reform antiquated zoning laws.
agutema t1_j5ru8rj wrote
Reply to comment by Yarvard in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Developers: it won’t.
Montu_Walks t1_j5rsps6 wrote
200k people is a town? According to the census, you need about a 50K+ people to make a metropolitan area.
RogueComment t1_j5rsk6f wrote
Reply to comment by GoodLittleTerrorist in Never Registered Car from out of State, am I Screwed? by AdOpposite983
Any cost you get a quote for and/or have receipts for help, but big money 💰 quotes is what your really looking for or its not worth your time.
Tires and wheels from les Schwab I wanted Toyo tires was like $2800 bucks. A paint job is like $3000- $6000 or more. Both quotes are easy to get. Brand new cars come with crappy tires so if your buying a used car you almost always need tires.
Good luck !
brilliant_beast t1_j5s9jao wrote
Reply to comment by up_down_underwater in Washington state might nix-single family zoning by magenta_placenta
Restricting the supply of new single family homes, assuming no change in demand, will absolutely drive up prices.
Maybe some people will be content living in a multi-family home instead. Others will continue to want single-family homes.