Recent comments in /f/Washington

cusmilie t1_j5vrwm0 wrote

I don’t know what you mean with open - as in listed in MLS? I don’t know exact percentages, but I would gather conservatively 75% never get listed. It’s under the table deals and in some cases taking advantage of elderly. The area started providing free legal housing advice to elderly which implies city knows it’s a problem.

1

AnonyMouseLeo t1_j5vosms wrote

I have checked it out, like I said.

California has not released any motorcyclist death statistics, since 2019. If they wanted to prove the numbers went down they could easily do that. Yet they won't release the numbers specifically only for motorcycles? All vehicle related deaths went up in California through 2021. 😑

Here the wiki page about lane splitting and the research across different countries. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane_splitting

No thanks. I don't believe it safer and obviously I am well aware of the topic.

19

Brandonnnn t1_j5vm1dd wrote

I've kind of been interested in doing that myself but i don't have the space living in apartments. Parting out cars can be pretty profitable, yeah?

(sry i can't answer your question)

2

SquidTips OP t1_j5vlsk8 wrote

What you’ve demonstrated here is that motorcycle fatalities are a problem on WA roads, and that is what lane splitting and filtering demonstrably to reduce.

By educating riders on when and how to safely filter through traffic, motorcycle accidents become less fatal, because they are happening at lower speeds. This reality is born out in the UC Berkeley study linked in the above post: > Lane-splitting motorcyclists were also injured much less frequently during their collisions. Lanesplitting riders were less likely to suffer head injury (9% vs 17%), torso injury (19% vs 29%), extremity injury (60% vs 66%), and fatal injury (1.2% vs 3.0%). Lane-splitting motorcyclists were equally likely to suffer neck injury, compared with non-lane-splitting motorcyclists.

−12

AnonyMouseLeo t1_j5vl5pn wrote

No! I refuse to support this and think it's awful and unsafe. No reason I should be able to drive between cars just because there is lots of traffic.

I have several buddies that really want this to happen and have tried extremely hard to get me to agree, but I don't. I'll just wait in traffic like everyone else. It's a fun but dangerous hobby.

https://wtsc.wa.gov/programs-priorities/motorcycles/

Motorcycles only comprise 3% of the road users in Washington State, but accounted for 15% of all fatalities and 19% of serious injuries in collisions between 2013 and 2017. About 1 in 5 motorcycle collisions result in serious injury or death and on average 75 riders die every year in collisions on Washington roads.

37

theredheaddiva t1_j5vafxb wrote

If you're going to mostly be in Tacoma, The Old Hangout downstairs at McMenamin's Elks Temple is a fun tiki bar with good food, fun décor and exotic drinks. Dash Point Park is lovely and for museums I've heard the LeMay Car Museum is cool, as well as the Museum of Glass. Haven't been to either yet but have been meaning to for a while.

In Seattle the must-sees are Pike Place Market and Seattle Center/Space Needle. Go to Kerry Park for an iconic view of the city, the mountain might even be out!

3

Wisconsin_Expat t1_j5v7y7s wrote

100%. And if I sell my home and a developer wants to buy it and eventually tear it down for more dense housing? Great. That’s the free market working.

Also new developments of single family homes aren’t going to be outlawed either. They’ll just be in the suburbs because there won’t be the demand for multi family like there is in the actual cities.

2

JohnDeere t1_j5v7o0l wrote

It literally does tho, its basic supply and demand I dont know why this terribly backwards idea comes from. We have a supply issue, we need more housing. Literally any housing helps. If the developers and investors were just buying legit any open property anywhere sure you may have a point but that would mean we would have no houses available either which we know is not the case. All housing built is good full stop.

1

Lindsiria t1_j5v1xlg wrote

How would supply go up for rental houses? If everyone was only allowed one house, it would mean there are no rental houses available.

What if I'm a family of five who just moved to an area but don't want to buy a place just yet?

Or someone who just wants a small townhouse to rent and not own?

Or a single mother, recently divorced, who doesn't have the down payment for a house.

0