Recent comments in /f/Washington
seanpatton0302 t1_jcwqu02 wrote
Reply to Camping Recommendations? by CT52
Mount Adams and St Helens area is usually pretty sunny over memorial day
Novel-Art3412 t1_jcwqk7d wrote
Reply to comment by CT52 in Camping Recommendations? by CT52
You're welcome! It's a great free campground with the old town of Liberty just down the road.
not-picky t1_jcwq541 wrote
Reply to comment by naazzttyy in The US government killed Lummi orphans for their land. White people continue to live on the murdered orphans land. This is the land that is beachfront in the middle of the reservation. by chiefswoneaglesloose
Well here's an alternate version of the story:
The islands up to Orcas were disputed by French and Americans at the time when French Catholic Missionaries committed atrocities and forced assimilation religious schools, later Americans took the land, and created the reservation system. There were many injustices, but that history is older than this story.
In the last century, Washington land wasn't super valuable outside of logging, and some people of the Lummi nation are struggling and sell the title of some costal land for money, thinking little of it. In the 90s tech makes it big and there's a population boom, suddenly costal development of nice homes are incredibly valuable, and developers are putting in homes in Sandy Point - a strip adjacent to Lummi nation.
The tribe now feels like its unfair, they ought to be paid a lot more of this now-very-valuable land. They claim the sale was not valid, the land is still Lummi. Although there are records of the sale on the American side, the Lummi story is that the sellers were orphans, part of the tribe by heritage but without written records. They weren't authorized to make such a sale, and so it should still belong to the tribe, the sellers were coerced because of medical debt. Now it's a he-said-she-said story, not that the land was sold but about the unverifiable nature of the tribal status of who sold it, and if that was a valid transaction. Because these homes are a strip alongside the reservation, the tribe then moves to cut water to the disputed land in retaliation. Without access to the outside utilities, the hope is to makes the land worthless to the developer and they can then buy it back to develop themselves and profit, but the developers sue and win the case after many years in the WA courts.
"As Leroy Deardorff, a Lummi natural resources officer, puts it: 'There are big bucks to be made out here.'"
Lummi nation passes around the tale of these orphans. In today's telling, they were murdered by white people! It's suspect that this particular tale doesn't appear to be told until the development dispute happened. Now salty chiefs wander reddit to tell the tale of evil white people stealing land, which is somewhat true in the long run, but the specifics of it change over time and 'white' just means anyone non-native. At this point Lummi nation identifies as 40% white, but those clinging most strongly to that heritage see anyone outside of reservation land as an oppressor and to blame for the theft of native lands and their modern problems. But mostly money.
You can read a 20-year-old telling of it here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1996/06/10/a-battle-of-rights-on-the-reservation/166b7f7e-e86f-4dcd-92e9-dc76b615757d/
ardesofmiche t1_jcwpzpp wrote
Reply to comment by CT52 in Camping Recommendations? by CT52
It could also hail or snow on the east side. It’s happened before!
CT52 OP t1_jcwpnhb wrote
Reply to comment by Novel-Art3412 in Camping Recommendations? by CT52
I’ll check it out! Thank you!
CT52 OP t1_jcwpmv2 wrote
Reply to comment by ardesofmiche in Camping Recommendations? by CT52
That was my thinking too. Thanks!
Novel-Art3412 t1_jcwp806 wrote
Reply to Camping Recommendations? by CT52
You might check out Liberty campground out east.
Haha1867hoser420 t1_jcwowtw wrote
Reply to comment by thesequimkid in Spot the bunny. Colville National Forest. by goinupthegranby
Or shadows!
juiceboxzero t1_jcwogw7 wrote
Reply to comment by spicy_sauceman_ in Labor Law- Personal Cellphones by DragonShadowlnx
Agreed. If you expect me to put any of your work shit on my phone, you should expect to subsidize my phone, or provide one to me.
Haha1867hoser420 t1_jcwobo1 wrote
Reply to comment by ThrilledFormerJW in Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
Look to the right of the rabbit.
ardesofmiche t1_jcwnxzs wrote
Reply to Camping Recommendations? by CT52
The east side is your biggest chance it’ll be sunny. Not a guarantee though, just a chance
spicy_sauceman_ t1_jcwnvxx wrote
Reply to comment by juiceboxzero in Labor Law- Personal Cellphones by DragonShadowlnx
In my opinion if you’re on your phone at work so much where it’s essentially part of the job, you should get a work phone to be reimbursed for any associated expenses.
gmc3101 OP t1_jcwmzuq wrote
Reply to comment by GreenThumbFun in Great Wheel on the Seattle waterfront. by gmc3101
Thanks for the positive words. You can see more of my work on my web site.
georgecolephoto.com/portfolios
Upstairs_Size4757 t1_jcwmzf7 wrote
Reply to Labor Law- Personal Cellphones by DragonShadowlnx
I'm a truck driver in Wa.state and we get reimbursed for using our personal phones for work. I don't know about the what the law is about it.
juiceboxzero t1_jcwmyes wrote
Reply to Labor Law- Personal Cellphones by DragonShadowlnx
You can always tell them you don't HAVE a phone capable of setting and receiving text messages.
[deleted] t1_jcwmveh wrote
Reply to comment by Educational_Ice5114 in Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
[removed]
Masculine_Teacup t1_jcwmma8 wrote
Reply to Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
Its right behind Waldo.
ASacredWorm t1_jcwln48 wrote
We went there to honor my mom on her birthday. She passed in December & we chose to place flowers in the water. She loved the ocean. Anyways, beautiful pictures. Thank you for sharing.
90percentviking t1_jcwlicp wrote
Reply to Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
It’s right behind me isn’t it?
ThrilledFormerJW t1_jcwl5g2 wrote
Reply to Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
It looks like a rabbit from a distance.
fishyaccount t1_jcwl3xm wrote
Reply to Labor Law- Personal Cellphones by DragonShadowlnx
Unfortunately I don't think Washington state has a law regarding this. Looking into it, I see 10 states that have such laws, and Washington is not one of them.
ThrilledFormerJW t1_jcwkkoa wrote
I see the bunny!
Educational_Ice5114 t1_jcwhm3c wrote
Reply to comment by Joham22 in Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
That’s a rabbit standing. Right behind the rabbit is a tiny fox ear and that’s all you can see
[deleted] t1_jcwgko0 wrote
Reply to comment by Joham22 in Spot the fox. South Beach, San Juan Island. by PenName
[removed]
CT52 OP t1_jcwr3nr wrote
Reply to comment by seanpatton0302 in Camping Recommendations? by CT52
Ohh good to know! Have definitely wanted to explore around St. Helens. Thanks!