Recent comments in /f/Washington

juiceboxzero t1_iv7wwdb wrote

Not as efficient...as what? That article doesn't compare to gas heating; only to itself at other temperatures, and to resistive electric (COP = 1).

Ulitmately, for most of Washington, the hours per year where the temperature is low enough for heat pumps to be unacceptably inefficient is quite small, and more than made up for by the rest of the year.

20

KevinCarbonara t1_iv7whnc wrote

The efficiency is less important - we already have residential houses. Why not cover them with solar panels?

Don't get me wrong, if they don't generate enough electricity to cover the cost of the panels or something like that, then efficiency is important. But there's no point comparing their efficiency to a solar farm.

If we're honest, all solar is far less efficient here than in most US states.

4

Byeuji t1_iv7pe0h wrote

Chasing growing electric demands and reducing reliance on fossil fuel in the consumer sector can be solved separately and simultaneously.

Just because this will put more demand on the electrical grid doesn't mean that energy can't come from sources other than the dam (including fossil fuels).

This move just centralizes the energy production to the electric grid, so that any source of energy can power it, rather than only fossil fuels.

They will use natural gas to power these homes too, but it'll be more efficient and safer than transporting gas to the last mile and burning it on site. And when the grid has other energy sources ready to handle the demand, the fossil fuel sources can be retired.

31

pokedmund OP t1_iv7og06 wrote

I came from the UK where we thought it was impossible for us to really leave the EU, and we did.

Moved to America in the same year where I thought Hillary would be president, and trump won.

I just don't take anything for granted anymore. Nothing is ever a certainty.

P.s. I votes for Murray this morning.

0

[deleted] t1_iv7l05p wrote

Any real right libertarian state decays into what Russia is.. essentially instantly. because right-libertarianism is not a workable system. it's as realistic as communism (that is to say: not at all) because they both make the same fundamentally naive assumptions about human nature

10

UncommonSense12345 t1_iv7k8xr wrote

Not sure I would describe Russia as libertarian…. Haven’t seen many libertarians advocating for state controlled/heavily influenced economy and mass invasions of neighboring countries….. a libertarian paradises is at least partially alive in lots of areas of rural USA where people live more in connection with nature and their neighbors. Obviously these people benefit from gov subsidies tho involving healthcare and infrastructure and agriculture but culturally the people do live a libertarian lifestyle (from my own experience).

−7