Recent comments in /f/WorcesterMA

godemers t1_ishp3ll wrote

If the victims know each other, it could be someone they knew who did it because they knew where they’d be at that time. If the victims were wearing some sort of gang symbols, it could be gang related. If the victims did not know each other that well or if it was random (the person didn’t have any reason to shoot all of them/nobody knew they’d be there/etc.) we may have a bigger issue on our hands. Then again anyone that shot six people and is on the run doesn’t have much to lose.

Article also didn’t specify how many people were at this afterparty, 8 people, 30 people, or 100 people. All of these factors make a difference.

I don’t know why you feel the need to keep going but I don’t have much scheduled for tonight.

2

godemers t1_ishnbc9 wrote

LMAO that’s hilarious - I’m not even going to respond to that because yes I do. Where do you think I’m from? Mars? The United Kingdom? Me and my roommates laughed at your responses.

I thought I was going to get an aneurysm for being concerned about the situation, and the fact law enforcement hasn’t released certain information that would let the public know whether or not if they are in danger.

I don’t think you want to know what I’m studying. 🤣😅

−4

godemers t1_ishkq1z wrote

The news article makes it sound like a cake walk, just saying. No mention of if people should be concerned because it was random, if all of the victims know each other, etc.

I’ve realized people in Massachusetts really don’t care about something unless it happens to them, a child, etc. Same with the drinks getting laced en masse in MA. But yeah, it’s a them problem - not an us problem.

−4