Recent comments in /f/askscience
ukezi t1_j1b0zth wrote
Reply to comment by DontWorryImADr in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
Lithium 6 absorbs a neuron and gets split into a helium and a tritium, so you need two times as much as you need tritium.
Outside_Teacher_8532 OP t1_j1b0uld wrote
Reply to comment by 123frogman246 in Can the immune system target specific elements inside the cell? by Outside_Teacher_8532
But let’s say you had an immune disease against your mitochondria; wouldn’t that make every cell in the body a target?
DontWorryImADr t1_j1b07jo wrote
Reply to comment by starmartyr in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
It better be, considering the volume of waste if all those batteries need replacement every 10 years. That would be the order of 1.89 billion kg of lithium every battery replacement cycle based upon 2030 numbers. Considering some of the issues with lithium, that would be all sorts of bad.
I don’t know that commercial scale recycling of said batteries is truly ready, but hence why it’s a big area of examination and study when it comes to converting transportation away from fossil fuels.
[deleted] t1_j1b0447 wrote
[deleted] t1_j1aywhs wrote
Reply to comment by blazzess in What assumptions are made about gravity when calculating the gravity within a galaxy? by bizzehdee
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1ayn4d wrote
Reply to comment by Techsterr in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1axnpd wrote
Reply to comment by kmacdough in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
[removed]
starmartyr t1_j1awu3m wrote
Reply to comment by DontWorryImADr in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
Would it be possible to extract the lithium from dead batteries?
Chagrinnish t1_j1avx5z wrote
Reply to comment by Bunslow in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
Here's a Goodman brand heat pump spec sheet (see p21) with COP numbers vs. ambient air temperature. They're giving a COP of 1.2 to 1.5 (120% to 150%) at -10F. It's going to be pretty cold before you'll want to use any resistive heat. The more important factor is that it can't put out as much heat (MBh in the chart) so it might not keep up.
Edit: Looking at price of Propane, Natural Gas, and electricity (in Iowa prices) you need a COP of 1.9 or 2.2, respectively, for the heat pump to be more cost effective. So that translates to the heat pump being more cost effiective around 5F and above vs propane or 15F vs natural gas. Unfortunately it's -6F right now :)
[deleted] t1_j1auyjp wrote
Reply to comment by graebot in How do fusion scientists expect to produce enough Tritium to sustain D-T fusion (see text)? by DanTheTerrible
[removed]
seven_tech t1_j1assin wrote
Reply to comment by Bunslow in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
Mine almost does.
It uses a maximum of 1.9kW of electricity to move up to 5.2kW of heat in best circumstances. That's a CoP of 2.74. And it's definitely not as efficient as they get.
seven_tech t1_j1asa41 wrote
Reply to comment by Calvert4096 in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
Haha, thanks. Yes, this was my whole point. I was never taught 'latent heat of fusion'. Nor were my colleagues. So we never had that ambiguity. Hence why I started the argument.
But hey, it's the internet. You'll get dragged for calling water wet...
Triabolical_ t1_j1aq9t2 wrote
Reply to comment by derpderp3200 in How and why do diet and lifestyle changes reverse insulin resistance? by derpderp3200
Interesting.
Your HOMA-IR would suggest that you are mildly insulin resistant, though opinions differ on what a good threshold is.
I believe the symptoms you are getting and the low blood glucose is a sign of reactive hypoglycemia. I don't have enough knowledge about dumping syndrome to have any opinion on it.
I can tell you that I had pretty significant reactive (or postprandial) hypoglycemia - I'd get back from lunch and 90 minute later I'd really want to go to sleep.
For me, the fix was to switch from the sandwiches and burritos I was eating to something that was much, much lower in refined carbs - salads and burrito bowls without the carbs. I ended up full keto and these days I'm what I would call "keto adjacent".
Given that you are having issues with carbohydrate intake, going low-carb for a while would be an interesting experiment.
[deleted] t1_j1aq1ze wrote
Reply to comment by Lookheswearingabelt in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
[removed]
seven_tech t1_j1apyhr wrote
Reply to comment by LionSuneater in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
Yes, I've had this argument several times.
We don't use that term in Australia. Because it's ambiguous. Fusion (more specifically nuclear fusion) is a specific physical process and its use in science is replacing fusion as in 'melting', which is a term dating back several hundred years. So we use melting now, because it's unambiguous otherwise.
You could argue, and many people would still agree, gay means happy. Yet you also wouldn't be unsurprised if people thought they were homosexual if you said 'I thought he was very gay' and many young people would never have heard gay used in any other context. Language changes and it's ambiguous. And science when speaking of fusion, doesn't like ambiguity.
[deleted] t1_j1b21ye wrote
Reply to comment by bl1eveucanfly in Why do we use phase change refrigerants? by samskiter
[removed]