Recent comments in /f/askscience

The_Last_Y t1_j28s7no wrote

Newton wasn’t they only person working on Gravity. Robert Hooke (and others) developed a lot of the theoretical backing for Gravity. He just didn’t know Calculus so he couldn’t connect theory to observations. Imo, the popular picture of Newton is largely of his own design; he used his position of power to take credit for things like Calculus and Gravity and downplay those who help contribute.

Gravity like most discoveries wasn’t divined in a single moment by a single person but was dozens of astronomers, physicists, and mathematicians asking questions and pushing the boundaries of our understanding. Newton once said he was standing on the shoulders of giants because he couldn’t have made the discoveries he did without those before and around him.

16

Onetime81 t1_j28r1du wrote

If death didn't occur until after crossing the event horizon, then this would be the best way to die, imo

As you cross you'd be able to watch the universe age and die. You'd get a conclusion to the story... Right before you cells started to unmesh themselves from your body.

Trade offs, amirite ¯⁠\⁠⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠⁠/⁠¯

42

australianjalien t1_j28lyt5 wrote

Got to admit I've never had a good concept of ageing with respect to speed. I can imagine a change in ageing when there is a speed differential, but once any two objects become adjacent again, say two atomic clocks, everything about relativity suggests they should show the same time again. If that weren't true then somehow relativity would be asymmetric, not conserved and/or there would necessarily be an absolute reference against which time dilation occurs, like what you are suggesting.

1