Recent comments in /f/askscience

CrateDane t1_j2d9qlb wrote

They're almost always broken down, but there are exceptions. In our gut, there is for example a cell type that's taking small samples of the proteins and longer peptides, in order to feed "information" to our immune system about what might be lurking in our gut. Unfortunately that includes prions. Some of the prions end up in neurons rather than the immune cells, and that's where the problem can happen. In principle it only takes one single prion to trigger the disease.

2

TheMikman97 t1_j2d808y wrote

Technically yes as long as restrictions were in place, but apparently bacterial respiratory infections skyrocketed lately in both numbers and severity due to the fact that 2 years of reduced contact seems to make people's immune system less prepared against them once said restrictions are lifted.

Tho this theory is controversial

−5

h3rbi74 t1_j2d72ic wrote

OP, a similar type of lag and cycling happens with big bodies of water— if you ever live near a lake or large pond, you will find that when summer first starts getting hot, the water is still REALLY COLD, and only starts to get truly perfect swimming temp when it’s already fall and the air is starting to be cooler.

2

r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j2d6z7z wrote

You grow up without immunity to many non-existing diseases, one more in not a problem. Flu is not training wheels for immunity, it's battle of Somme. Anything that makes you actively sick is not a good thing, even though you recover and the consequences are minor, they are there and they add up to significant problems in your old age. So extinction of infectious diseases is absolutely a good thing.

33

JDS150k t1_j2d660z wrote

Isn't this a very bad thing? Children will be growing up without developing immunity for this strain, and probably many other(?) virus strains. You mentioned reservoirs in untested populations. What percentage of the global population is regularly tested for this "extinct" strain of flu? I assume it's nit many, leaving huge potential for reservoirs of strains thought extinct, making it most likely that the strain will come back. Or come back from a non-human organism. And when it comes back, people would have less immunity to it and if you compound that with the fact that it would come back as a wave, with everyone getting it at once (as happens with the flu virus) then surely that is a bad thing. Or am I missing something?

This reminds me if a metaphor from Nicholas Nassim Taleb's book Antifragile. If you want to fight forest fires, your instinct might be to ride out and and extinguish every small forest fire, to prevent it becoming a big one. But in doing so, you save more and more tinder from being burned away, leading to a very easily flammable landscape.

In the case of covid protocols, I worry that preventing the small viruses from barraging our immune systems might create an easily infectable population.

I'm way out on a limb here intellectually so I'd appreciate some discourse on this.

−3

r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j2d5wix wrote

Carbon is sequestered because sedimentary rocks form which contain a lot of carbon, without volcanic emissions to offset that, atmosphere would slowly(over millions of years) run low on carbon. That has happened in geologic history resulting in several periods of snowball Earth, sea ice all the way to equator. To break out of this state enough volcanic activity had to happen for CO2 concentrations in atmosphere to build up again.

2