Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j2dwl1k wrote
A18o14 t1_j2dwhh7 wrote
Reply to comment by Effective-Return-754 in In Parkinson disease, why doesn't the adrenal gland fill the dopamine deficiency? by Actual-Pumpkin1567
They state it eliminates the tremor, that is just a side effect of PD so yes, it just deals with the symptoms. Funny enough most people with tremors do not have PD but jus a "Essential tremor". Bad enough but not that severe.
With PD parts of your brain are dying, so if a therapy does not deal with that it is not curing PD.
[deleted] t1_j2dw5e8 wrote
[deleted] t1_j2dvj6e wrote
Reply to How is Historic Sea Level Measured? by Rosanbo
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2dvhzt wrote
[deleted] t1_j2dv79j wrote
Reply to Are Educational Video Games Effective? by MEoDP1
[removed]
Taalnazi t1_j2duhrm wrote
Reply to comment by rootofallworlds in What is the timeline of star death? by jfgallay
Thanks. Hmm... and so far, no star has been discovered yet in their carbon-burning or more advanced-burning phase? Or do carbon stars fall under this?
There are supernovas we observe, sure, but do we know when we look at the very last stages before it? Can we detect the 600-or-less-years phases?
[deleted] OP t1_j2duh6o wrote
Reply to comment by Figueroa_Chill in Was there a decrease in other infectious diseases other than Covid due to wearing masks during the past 2 years? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2dsgj6 wrote
shimmeringships t1_j2drwaz wrote
Reply to comment by Doleydoledole in Was there a decrease in other infectious diseases other than Covid due to wearing masks during the past 2 years? by [deleted]
Thanks for the correction!
shimmeringships t1_j2dru09 wrote
Reply to comment by DoomGoober in Was there a decrease in other infectious diseases other than Covid due to wearing masks during the past 2 years? by [deleted]
Thanks for the correction!
rootofallworlds t1_j2drq9r wrote
Reply to comment by Taalnazi in What is the timeline of star death? by jfgallay
Iron can fuse but the fusion absorbs energy instead of releasing it. So it only accelerates the collapse of the core.
[deleted] t1_j2dqk5t wrote
Reply to comment by adam12349 in How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
[removed]
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j2dqcdl wrote
Reply to comment by MarredCheese in Was there a decrease in other infectious diseases other than Covid due to wearing masks during the past 2 years? by [deleted]
All the usual stuff you see in old age, cardiovascular problems, lung capacity, neurological problems, lifetime of being sick over and over again makes it all worse down the line. It accumulates same as mundane injuries, health damaging work environment and all that.
Taalnazi t1_j2dq8ws wrote
Reply to comment by rootofallworlds in What is the timeline of star death? by jfgallay
Can nothing be fused beyond iron, even if only temporarily stable? If so, would a quasi-star be able to put this off, due to its sheer mass? Or something else?
BluScr33n t1_j2doxc7 wrote
Reply to comment by mycatpeesinmyshower in How much does the liquid magma of the Earth affect it's surface temperature? by tripperfunster
No, Earth is way more massive than Mars and won't lose its atmosphere as easily. The upper layer of the atmosphere is ionized by solar radiation. Instead of simply stripping our atmosphere away, the solar wind would induce a magnetic field in this upper ionosphere. And this induced magnetic field would exactly cancel the magnetic field from the solar wind, ultimately deflecting the solar wind around Earth. This is exactly what happened on Venus and is one of the reasons why Venus still has an atmosphere.
The same thing also happens on Mars, but because Mars is significantly less massive it still lost most of its atmosphere over time from various processes.
But you are correct with your idea that Earth would lose its intrinsic magnetic field if the core cooled down and solidified.
adam12349 t1_j2domty wrote
Reply to How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
One of the important things about these scattering experiments is the thickness of your target object. If the target is thin the interaction can be treated as individual scatterings on the atoms of your target object. If the object is thick the interaction at the front of the object effect the interaction at the back, so your scattering is no longer the sum of individual scatterings.
Knowing the crossection of the experiment you can calculate a distance that the particles of the oncoming beam can freely travel in your target. Which means that a collision isn't guaranteed. A thin target would let a lot of the particles through without interaction but some of them would end up colliding and those can be treated as independent collisions. If the target is thicker than that distance almost all particles of the beam would collide statistically even those that scattered at the front of the object scattering again in the target.
So you want your target to be as thin as possible and gold foil can be really thin like a few atoms thin. Which is perfect for scattering experiments but of course there are other options too.
MarredCheese t1_j2dnn3m wrote
Reply to comment by r2k-in-the-vortex in Was there a decrease in other infectious diseases other than Covid due to wearing masks during the past 2 years? by [deleted]
What are the minor consequences that add up significantly in old age? That sounds scary.
[deleted] t1_j2dn8ob wrote
Reply to comment by sgarn in How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2dmny7 wrote
[removed]
Baba_Yaga_Stonks t1_j2dmegv wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in thermal expansion affecting climate change? by mjoninha
That's interesting! Thanks for the citations also
[deleted] t1_j2dl36u wrote
Reply to comment by Glaselar in How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
[removed]
CrustalTrudger t1_j2dku87 wrote
Reply to comment by Baba_Yaga_Stonks in thermal expansion affecting climate change? by mjoninha
You are incorrect, halosteric (i.e., change in sea level due to salinity related changes in density) sea level change is definitely a thing. It's a smaller component than thermosteric changes, e.g. Durack et al., 2014 estimate the magnitude of halosteric changes to be 1/4 of the magnitude of thermosteric changes, but still significant.
keithatcpt t1_j2diuh9 wrote
Reply to comment by WayneHudsonIII in I live in New Hampshire, USA. How come it continues to get colder here after the Winter solstice? by WayneHudsonIII
Exactly. The summer solstice is in June, but typically July into August is the hottest part of the year.
[deleted] t1_j2dwr9j wrote
Reply to Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
[removed]