Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j2fbule wrote
[deleted] t1_j2fbjfb wrote
[removed]
Kailaylia t1_j2fbe7i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
Some people believe the Earth is flat and contains an advanced civilization hidden deep in its centre, accessible only through a hole in the antarctic. .
crono141 t1_j2fb82y wrote
Reply to comment by S-8-R in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
Is this not the plot of "Parasite Eve"?
Kailaylia t1_j2faxjw wrote
Reply to comment by OlyScott in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
You're correct. If mitochondrial Eve only had one daughter, she would not be mitochondrial Eve, her daughter wold be.
However science is not talking about an individual whom they have identified. Science is talking about a time in history when the woman from whom we inherited our mitochondria must have lived.
Kailaylia t1_j2fahw0 wrote
Reply to comment by tossedmoose in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
Mitochondria don't combine. They are inherited directly from, and only from, the mother.
Perhaps there was a disaster that wiped out other women, or perhaps other human groups failed to survive to pass their mitochondria on to the present day. For whatever reason, mitochondrial Eve is the original source of the mitochondria all of us share.
Gonzjon23 t1_j2f9ivr wrote
Reply to comment by byllz in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
But thanks for the tip, I already was for the low fat content.
[deleted] t1_j2f9elw wrote
Reply to comment by Kraz_I in How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2f8z56 wrote
Reply to comment by byllz in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2f8woq wrote
Reply to comment by agate_ in How is Historic Sea Level Measured? by Rosanbo
[removed]
byllz t1_j2f8sip wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
Quite the opposite. Humans are high in mercury. Except for vegetarians. Feel free to eat vegetarians.
[deleted] t1_j2f8qau wrote
S-8-R t1_j2f8fhb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
Can you post a link to any peer reviewed papers that favor this explanation?
Kraz_I t1_j2f8byk wrote
Reply to comment by enderjaca in How did Rutherford arrive at gold foil as the best choice for his particle experiments? by Poltibolsa
Gold is the most ductile and malleable of all pure metals (and probably alloys too, since they tend to be harder and more brittle). This is why it's used in computers and advanced electronics, even though silver and copper are more conductive. A very small amount goes a long way, it can still hold together at under 1 micron thickness.
If you tried to hammer lead into a foil that thin at ambient temperature, (which is the traditional way gold foil is made), it would crumble to bits.
Even in antiquity, artisans knew how to make very thin gold foil by hammering it thin, then folding it with paper between the layers to prevent cold welding, and continuing the process, with the number of layers doubling each time.
[deleted] t1_j2f7qer wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2f7kxe wrote
[deleted] t1_j2f7da7 wrote
BioTechproject t1_j2f75k2 wrote
Reply to comment by BrokenImmersion in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
I wouldn't say it doesn't matter. It is still a significant factor.
For example, a similar concept applies when prescribing medication. Overweight people have larger volumes and thus, depending on meds, need more to reach the same effect.
[deleted] t1_j2f6yyr wrote
Reply to comment by Malalang in Do nerve endings closer to the brain / spinal cord take less time to transmit signals because there is less distance to travel? by ssinatra3
[removed]
Tabbeber t1_j2f6win wrote
Reply to comment by tranion10 in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
Not sure about tuna specifically, since that's a fairly large fish, but the nutritional benefits of regularly eating fish typically outweigh the harm IIRC.
[deleted] t1_j2f6tcy wrote
[removed]
JonesP77 t1_j2f6kq0 wrote
Reply to comment by Shadowkiller00 in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
I dont understand. I dont get the connection between differences in our mitochondrial DNA and the time we can follow it back. How do we get to that number? I really seem to miss something because i have no clue what youre saying.
BrokenImmersion t1_j2f68t1 wrote
Reply to comment by BioTechproject in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
Ah so we can ingest more but because it sticks around so long and we live so long it doesn't really matter?
BioTechproject t1_j2f631l wrote
Reply to comment by BrokenImmersion in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
yes, but that's countered by living long meaning you can take up way more, than an organism that e.g. is larger but lives shorter.
[deleted] t1_j2fbut4 wrote
Reply to comment by crono141 in Why is Mitochondrial Eve dated to 150-170,000 years go? by jayhovian
[removed]