Recent comments in /f/askscience

Mountebank t1_j2flzjf wrote

I can’t believe how they’re using their bare hands when moving the stack of gold foil in that jackhammer press. Does Japan not have an equivalent to OSHA? Or does that not apply to small businesses like the one in the video?

For comparison, my workplace has a similar machine, but you need to press two buttons with both hands to start it and there’s a screen of lasers between the user and the press that shuts the machine down if the lasers are blocked.

7

VoilaVoilaWashington t1_j2fkhph wrote

Say you have an heirloom poem that each member of your family has to transcribe. It's in Latin, so you have no idea what it says.

Even with all the checking, we know that every new generation makes minor mistakes transcribing it, which build up over time. The same poem has somehow spread all over the world because your family is all over.

How do you find out when it was written?

Well, you compare the last few generations' worth of poems and realize it's on average 1.75 mistakes each time it's transcribed. Now you compare your family's to another one elsewhere on earth, and there are 500 differences - how many generations ago did they branch off?

49

Tabbeber t1_j2fhkz0 wrote

You're correct, I should have been sure before commenting.

The intention of my comment was that, although seafood contains a non-insignificant amount of mercury (and other toxins), one should not be afraid of eating fish regularly.

The most recent study I could find found no evidence of developmental harm among children with high seafood diet mothers.

21

VoilaVoilaWashington t1_j2fhenh wrote

Yes, but it also means we need to eat more.

Take two animals with identical metabolisms, one's 10kg and one's 100kg.

If both eat 0.1mg per day of a toxin, then yeah, the bigger creature will do better.

But if the food contains 0.1 mg/kg of food, and the big creature needs to eat 10x more food to survive, then it balances out.

11

glacierre2 t1_j2ffyv6 wrote

The problem is not fish dying from mercury poisoning (I mean, that would be a problem, a really big one). Much before the levels required for that, the fish may have for example brain damage, which is not such a big deal for fish, but an equivalent in humans render you invalid to carry out a normal life.

16

MicrotracS3500 t1_j2ffaqu wrote

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02172758

Based on this link, UV absorbing intraocular lenses have been around since the ‘80s, but not all of them are very effective, and they’re not universally used. Based on a little reading, it’s unclear what makes it difficult, but my guess is that it’s hard to exclusively block UV light without affecting the tint and clarity of the lens.

3

r2k-in-the-vortex t1_j2fcg8o wrote

Yes, but when that happens you can just drill deeper. But of course, there lies the crux of geothermal power and why it isn't really taking off. In most parts of the world, that drilling part is just too expensive to pay off. Would be really neat if we could drill cheaper though, it's a stable and near limitless energy source that is available everywhere. When the economics improve I'm sure it'll take off as an energy source, but when that might happen is anyone's guess.

5