Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j4tqr6g wrote
[deleted] t1_j4tqfvv wrote
Reply to comment by Chemomechanics in What happens to the energy of sound in space? by full_hammer
[removed]
aspheric_cow t1_j4tpg0p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What happens to the energy of sound in space? by full_hammer
A tuning fork would not vibrate measuralby faster in vacuum. If air resistance changed its vibration frequency (pitch) by a measurable amount, it would also vibrate slower when its vibration amplitude is less - i.e. its pitch would go down as the vibration decays.
[deleted] t1_j4tp9mq wrote
[removed]
TheJasonKientz t1_j4to0cc wrote
A sound doesn’t have any energy of its own, it’s all kinetic energy of interacting matter. So when a sound wave from earth reaches the edge of the atmosphere, the molecules will just not bump into another molecule and the sound wave ceases to exist. But the molecules all still have their kinetic energy. And eventually that will dissipate as heat.
The person who talked about the tuning fork is right. I’ll add, though, that that tuning fork in space technically never made any sound because there was no medium for the vibration of the tuning fork to propagate through.
CatboyInAMaidOutfit t1_j4tjx91 wrote
Reply to comment by RobusEtCeleritas in If nuclear fission in U-235 causes the atom to be split into 2 smaller atoms (such as Kr-92 and Ba-141) then how is it that U-236 is produced as waste since the U-235 was just split into smaller peices? by Ian98766
Is this basically how they make plutonium? And afterwards if it's all mixed together and more or less stable they separate it chemically?
DarthMaulATAT t1_j4tgax5 wrote
Reply to comment by --Ty-- in What makes a fiber or fabric absorbent, wicking, breathable, or cooling? by DisenchantedAuD
I love my merino wool undergarments. I've had them for over 10 years and they're only now just starting to show some wear. A bit pricy, but non-itchy, lasts a decade, keeps me warm and doesn't smell much even after several days of camping. It's incredible stuff.
[deleted] t1_j4tfseu wrote
[removed]
SharkAttackOmNom t1_j4tfd7x wrote
Reply to comment by zemsten in If nuclear fission in U-235 causes the atom to be split into 2 smaller atoms (such as Kr-92 and Ba-141) then how is it that U-236 is produced as waste since the U-235 was just split into smaller peices? by Ian98766
Yes when referencing the negative temperature coefficient, that’s the water (and in general the heat of the whole core) which lowers reactivity due to inefficient neutron-slowing. The effect is even more pronounced of the water is allowed to boil to steam. The steam bubbles making “voids” which won’t slow neutrons, basically at all.
Neat trick can be played here. Thermal output can be controlled in a BWR reactor by increasing or decreasing the coolant flow. Faster flow will drive the threshold of boiling water higher, allowing more of the fuel rod to fission. If they want to slow the reactor, slow the coolant flow rate. The water will boil lower and reaction rate slows at the top of bundles. BWR control rods insert from the bottom so it can control reaction rates from bottom up and top down.
[deleted] t1_j4tchsc wrote
Reply to Why does the existence of magnetic monopoles imply quantized electric charges? by Speterius
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4ta8st wrote
Reply to comment by full_hammer in What happens to the energy of sound in space? by full_hammer
[removed]
zemsten t1_j4t7qs2 wrote
Reply to comment by SharkAttackOmNom in If nuclear fission in U-235 causes the atom to be split into 2 smaller atoms (such as Kr-92 and Ba-141) then how is it that U-236 is produced as waste since the U-235 was just split into smaller peices? by Ian98766
This is due to the temperature of the moderator (water) though, isn't it? At least mostly? This is important because a fast neutron has a higher probability of slowing down through water as a moderator when that water is more dense. More slowing down -> more thermal neutrons -> higher likelihood of a thermal fission. Fast fissions are negligible except for during source range reactor startups.
Lord_Gadget t1_j4t7mjk wrote
Reply to comment by Prestigious_Carpet29 in If the left side of your brain controls the right side of your body and vice versa, then what does that mean about people who are left handed? by Reflector368
Correct, this is why I put in the qualifier at the end about the question from a "pure functionality standpoint".
It's just the dominant neural pathway and really nothing more.
zebediah49 t1_j4t72hl wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What happens to the energy of sound in space? by full_hammer
Minimally faster. Without the air resistance it'll sit a bit closer to ideal resonance -- but even in air it's extremely close. The mechanical properties of the fork are what dictate the frequency, and those remain unchanged.
[deleted] t1_j4t5s51 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4t5kn9 wrote
Pedromac t1_j4t4005 wrote
Reply to comment by bikedork5000 in If nuclear fission in U-235 causes the atom to be split into 2 smaller atoms (such as Kr-92 and Ba-141) then how is it that U-236 is produced as waste since the U-235 was just split into smaller peices? by Ian98766
I feel like what you just said was so painfully obvious but it just never occurred to me the temperature would fluctuate so much at the atomic level but reading what you said makes perfect sense. Thank you for that
heartless-tramp OP t1_j4t3xbx wrote
Reply to comment by marypoppindatpussy in What would happen if we took an organism's DNA, separated each and every couple of DNA that coded for ONE SINGLE PROTEIN and jumbled it up in a different order? by heartless-tramp
changed the locations of all dna that code for a protein
yes it was correct
[deleted] t1_j4tqrmw wrote
Reply to How is it tomatoes have fat content? How does it get in there? by SubieOrNotSubie
[removed]