Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j5fane7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5fan3u wrote
[removed]
Old-Advice-5685 t1_j5faiqp wrote
No, the mutations that occur in your regular cells are basically mutations in the mechanisms that control cell division and/or cell death. So they keep growing, causing a tumor. For the most part, they still look like the same cell on the outside. That’s what your body doesn’t mount a strong immune response and it is hard to target them with drugs. All the houses look the same, there’s no way to give the bacteriophage an address.
openly_gray t1_j5f92gw wrote
Reply to comment by tomtink1 in Do bugs Ccommonly die of old age in nature? by 14159548210
Technically “old age” since the short lifespan is a biological feature ( I believe some of them don’t even have a working digestive system). But that certainly can be debated
Faelwolf t1_j5f90re wrote
Reply to Why did pre-modern cannon fire iron shot instead of lead shot of equivalent poundage? by JarWrench
You're thinking of round shot. It was made of iron because lead would deform on impact, and not have a tendency to bounce, or would expend it's energy in deformation when hitting a solid structure. Iron shot's biggest advantage was momentum. It would bounce along as basically a wrecking ball, causing massive injuries to anyone/thing caught in it's way, or impart it's energy into the masonry of a fortification or the hull of a ship. The early round shot was actually made of stone, around the 15th century or so.
There were a number of shot available for cannon, some which were made of lead, such as some grape/cannister shot, an antipersonnel round made up of much smaller balls.
[deleted] t1_j5f8tq5 wrote
[deleted] t1_j5f8rhi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5f5ytf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5f4uoj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5f48ck wrote
Reply to comment by agate_ in Can planetary rings be a solid surface? by barbadizzy
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5f13ws wrote
Reply to comment by Dorocche in Can planetary rings be a solid surface? by barbadizzy
[removed]
Prestigious_Carpet29 t1_j5eylrj wrote
The simple answer is that a suitably-designed phased array of the same size (same cross-sectional area) as an equivalent dish would be expected to perform approximately equally (in terms of directivity and signal-strength). On those basic measures, it can't really perform better than a dish.
In a receiver, the signals from the individual array elements are electronically summed (at some stage of the signal processing) with subtle time-delays between the elements in order to "phase" the array and create the required directivity. Signals from the wanted direction will sum constructively, while signals from other directions will tend to be non-coherent (at random phases) from the different received elements, and thus average down to a proportionately lower level in the summation.
The key advantage of phased-arrays is that the beam-direction can be "electronically" steered (i.e. by changing timings in the signal-processing), as opposed to having to physically move a dish. The electronic beam-steering can be essentially instantaneous, whereas the rate at which you can move a dish on motors is limited by physical mass, inertia, motor-power, ... and will be subject to mechanical wear. This high-speed steering is near-essential for tracking low-earth satellites, or military radar, among other applications.
There may then be second-order benefits such as physical simplicity, lighter-weight, less wind-loading etc. But if you need super-speed scanning, then moving a physical dish of more than a certain size is simply impractical. Very large dishes are major engineering projects, as the dish needs to retain it's shape to within a fraction of a wavelength (say 1/10th of a wavelength) as the dish is moved and steered. In contrast, a phased array can be fitted on a flat (or even uneven surface/terrain) and "electronically" flattened (corrected for physical distortions).
A further benefit of phased arrays (for relevant applications) is that you can double up (or triple, or...) in your signal-processing, and then receive from two or more directions simultaneously with the same physical antenna. That's something you simply cannot do with a dish. Again useful for Starlink-type applications where you have multiple low-earth satellites, or military radar when you want to track multiple fast-moving targets.
If you have a phased array with a lot of elements then you may be able to control side-lobes better than with a dish, which may be important if you not only want to maximise the signal strength of a wanted signal, but also reject or suppress an unwanted signal of the same frequency but coming from a different physical direction.
Phased array antenna with many elements are likely to be more expensive than dishes, often considerably so, although the cost of RF electronics is continually falling.
(I don't have any first-hand experience with phased-array antenna, but have a lot of experience with signal-processing in other applications, where the underlying reasoning would be similar)
[deleted] t1_j5ewwdt wrote
[deleted] t1_j5ew8ya wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5ew7iw wrote
Reply to comment by louiswins in If neutrons have a half-life of 15 minutes, how isn't everything just falling apart all the time? by PanikLIji
[removed]
RnotSPECIALorUNIQUE t1_j5eu7r7 wrote
Reply to comment by Weed_O_Whirler in Whats stopping us from sending a probe into a black hole if we haven't already? by stealth941
Impulse Radiating Antennas have managed to get around the inverse square law. They've been in study for the last 40 years.
http://www.farr-research.com/ has tons of info on them.
[deleted] t1_j5eu6me wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5eqm4s wrote
LaSicolana t1_j5epi5o wrote
Reply to Can planetary rings be a solid surface? by barbadizzy
I guess if it's thin enough it's mathematically possible. However, it would be really sensitive to any pertubations. These stresses would break it to pieces sooner than later.
[deleted] t1_j5enf4m wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why did pre-modern cannon fire iron shot instead of lead shot of equivalent poundage? by JarWrench
[removed]
Buford12 OP t1_j5emnrl wrote
Reply to comment by Fit_Solution3312 in What is the difference between a battery and a capacitor? by Buford12
thank you.
Fit_Solution3312 t1_j5emk4j wrote
Reply to comment by Buford12 in What is the difference between a battery and a capacitor? by Buford12
That would be Lithium ion batteries, if you want the device to be rechargeable.
Buford12 OP t1_j5el5xl wrote
Reply to comment by Fit_Solution3312 in What is the difference between a battery and a capacitor? by Buford12
Thanks , One more question, which device stores or produces the most energy per unit of mass.
Scharmberg t1_j5fau3b wrote
Reply to comment by The_ChortleMachine in Do bugs Ccommonly die of old age in nature? by 14159548210
Why are they in stasis for so long?