Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j693mzw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j693k9k wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
PD_31 t1_j693bqu wrote
Reply to Shouldn't goldilocks zones shift over time? by LaRoara42
The Goldilocks zone will depend on the star's temperature and therefore how much its energy output is, so yes over time it will shift. To take an extreme example, our Sun's late life stage will see it expand and swallow up the earth; clearly we will no longer be in the zone when that happens.
So yes, the zone will shift but the lifespan of a star is so long that it won't change on a human (or even humanity's) timescale for most stars.
[deleted] t1_j692yxa wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in can gemstones be melted into a gradient? by Acceptable_Shift_247
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j692ybp wrote
Reply to comment by WardStradlater in Why can an adult’s GI tract expel C. botulinum spores while an infant can’t? by curiousnboredd
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j692u30 wrote
Reply to Shouldn't goldilocks zones shift over time? by LaRoara42
[removed]
pacaruru t1_j692rkv wrote
Reply to comment by MxPunkin in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
If we're talking absurdly long timescales it would eventually go to absolute zero as it's mass decayed into energy and it released that energy into a form that was no longer accessible or useful but by then it would be a bit of a stretch to say the object still exists any longer.
[deleted] t1_j692ir8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j692gql wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j692dr3 wrote
[removed]
Sir-HP23 t1_j6929sp wrote
I seem to remember watching a programme where some light winged moth have a new strain of dark winged moths after the industrial revolution when soot was making the tree bark black. The two strains had got to the point where they had trouble interbreeding so, new sources.So that’s in the last couple of hundred years and in direct response to us.
[deleted] t1_j69299w wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in can gemstones be melted into a gradient? by Acceptable_Shift_247
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j691gt0 wrote
[removed]
Beginning_Cat_4972 t1_j691ep9 wrote
Reply to comment by varontron in How are scientists using AI and machine learning to analyze large datasets in the field of genomics? by balbeer_12
Similarly, for identifying genetic variations linked to diseases and how other genes may be related or interact with those genes.
[deleted] t1_j691529 wrote
Reply to comment by Yaver_Mbizi in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
Pirrus05 t1_j69132s wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in can gemstones be melted into a gradient? by Acceptable_Shift_247
I mean, who doesn’t have a diamond anvil cell in their kitchen?!
[deleted] t1_j6911j0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j69113p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j69106g wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j690y8p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
BlazeObsidian t1_j690uxs wrote
Reply to Are there any species of plant that require seasonal temperature drops as part of their life-cycle? by I3P
A lot of trees require their seeds to undergo stratification before they can germinate.
For example the Japanese maple seeds undergo cold stratification where the seeds fall to the ground and lay dormant there under the snow. Only after this process is done will they germinate.
Note that this is not a hard and fast rule. But seeds that don’t undergo stratification take longer and have much lower chances of germination
[deleted] t1_j690tji wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j690f7m wrote
[removed]
RShArren t1_j6903sq wrote
Reply to comment by ManyThingsLittleTime in Is there an upper limit to structure size in a vacuum? Could a sufficiently advanced civilisation build a galaxy sized structure in space or would it become too massive and collapse in on itself? by CubanHermes
Well, that depends on what kind of structure do you need and how you build it...
Let's say it's a ring made of nanites (which sort of solves all material tension problems, because we assume that nanites can automatically rebuild any damages). Let's assume that the radius of the ring is 50000 light years (an approximation for the Milky Way radius, which equals 5*10^19 m), its width is 1 km (10^3 m) and its thickness is 100 nm (a size of a nanite, 10^-7 m). Let's assume that the nanites are made of carbon and have its density, which equals 3*10^3 kg/m^3.
The mass of this structure is going to be:
M = ro * V = ro * S * L = ro * h * w * 2* pi * R = 3*10^3 * 10^3 * 10^-7 * 2 * 3 * 5 * 10^19 = 9 * 10^19 kg.
Milky Way mass is 10^12 solar masses, and the mass of the Sun is 10^30 kg. In fact, the mass of the Moon is 10^22 kg. So one Moon is more than enough to build such a ring around the Galaxy...
CubanHermes OP t1_j693pjj wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in Is there an upper limit to structure size in a vacuum? Could a sufficiently advanced civilisation build a galaxy sized structure in space or would it become too massive and collapse in on itself? by CubanHermes
Ok, so I just need FTL travel, many galaxies worth of materials, some way to heat the place and billions of workers and we can make a hellish galaxy sized Ikea flat pack colony. Excellent.