Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_j9s3k4m wrote
Reply to Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
EBtwopoint3 t1_j9s3fam wrote
Reply to comment by Imperator-Solis in What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
Not 2500 years, until the rate of satellite re-entry becomes 2500 times higher. That is a per year figure, not one that adds up.
[deleted] t1_j9s1tab wrote
Reply to Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9s0u4m wrote
Reply to comment by cagandrax in What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9s0a3b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9rzthc wrote
ThomasEdmund84 t1_j9rzc2q wrote
> EDIT: To piggyback this logic, why don't we have more 'spares' of other organs. Why is the redundancy factor only built into kidneys?
Its likely to do with trade-offs between the resources the human body needs to grow and maintain vital organs and also how feasible having redundancy is.
e.g. lungs are perhaps semi-redundant, obviously having one lung = much reduce physical capacity and isn't great, but we do have two.
My physics might be a little off - but I think its counter productive to have two hearts? Human digestive system already has lots of failures in its complex system so doubling up would probably mean more room for errors.
Two brains? Forget about it.
[deleted] t1_j9rycry wrote
Reply to comment by fastspinecho in What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9rxh84 wrote
[deleted] t1_j9rufwh wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
[removed]
jedadkins t1_j9rqjvz wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
Yea this really seems like a problem of scale, ~2.5m tonnes of aluminum needed to reach the lower bound is an insane amount. Maybe once we start actually commercializing space it could be an issue but by then we should have a better option then just crashing stuff to get it out of orbit
McHildinger t1_j9rppjj wrote
Reply to comment by Mediocrasleep in How can Doctors tell if one of your kidneys isn't working? by FineLetMeSayIt
I was told that the kidneys are somehow related/associated with the ovaries/testis in a fetus, and that is why there are likely two kidneys; people born with only one kidney often only have one functional gonad.
[deleted] t1_j9rpncn wrote
berliniam t1_j9rp3s1 wrote
Reply to comment by hercola in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
Awesome, thanks for the corrections. Over-layman-ized myself haha
[deleted] t1_j9rp00m wrote
Reply to comment by hercola in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9roczw wrote
Reply to comment by Bad_DNA in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
KeyofE t1_j9rmvyd wrote
Reply to comment by Whako4 in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
Mixing colors from the opposite side of the color wheel (blue and orange, green and red for example) makes brown,so if you mix a bunch of colors together, you are likely going to mix some that are across from each other.
[deleted] t1_j9rmn5l wrote
Reply to comment by berliniam in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9rmaod wrote
Reply to Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
bladeelover429 t1_j9rlkmr wrote
Reply to What will be the environmental impact of de-orbiting 42,000 Starlink satellites every five years? (Explanation in post) by OvidPerl
Well, from purely a chemistry standpoint, aluminum metal burning up in the atmosphere would mostly create aluminum trioxide. The EPA doesn't consider it to be a dangerous substance, and I can't come up with other reactions with Atmospheric gasses that would form anything significant.
Now from a climate standpoint- large amounts very tiny particles do have a measurable effect on global warming. If we're burning up a mass of aluminum on the same order as all of the meteorites that enter the atmosphere, then the effect is probably negligible, however. But I only say this because I haven't yet seen any climate models that consider particles added by meteorites. This could mean that it's either too difficult to model or its just not important enough. Climate change is notoriously difficult to model, unfortunately.
[deleted] t1_j9rlff3 wrote
[deleted] t1_j9rij76 wrote
Reply to Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9ri8ie wrote
Reply to comment by loki130 in Why can’t you “un-blur” a blurred image? by so-gold
[removed]
loki130 t1_j9ri1xj wrote
Reply to comment by hatsune_aru in Why can’t you “un-blur” a blurred image? by so-gold
Then why are you saying everyone is wrong when they're pretty much all mentioning that deblurring methods exist but don't amount to perfect image recovery?
[deleted] t1_j9s3z52 wrote
Reply to comment by Bad_DNA in Why is urine yellow? by nateblackmt
[removed]