Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_jbbujaw wrote
[deleted] t1_jbbuj1t wrote
[deleted] t1_jbbtru0 wrote
Reply to comment by --VoidHawk-- in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
[removed]
--VoidHawk-- t1_jbbrqyk wrote
Reply to comment by bkinstle in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
I would think it would be better, but I too wonder this and if so, how much better?
[deleted] t1_jbbrqc0 wrote
CrateDane t1_jbbrhyg wrote
Reply to comment by HuckyBuddy in What is the difference between serotonin, ocytocine and dopamine ? by [deleted]
Those descriptions are way too simplistic. Parkinson's is caused by a loss of dopaminergic neurons, but has little to do with reward signaling, it's a degeneration of the motor system.
nill0c t1_jbbnvtd wrote
Reply to comment by Agouti in Does galvanic corrosion take place when aluminum bronze is in contact with steel? by UserNo485929294774
20 years should be fine, we have some galvanized fence in a hedge that's from around 1960. It's pretty rusty now, but I'm sure it would have vanished by now if it wasn't protected.
LowerEntropy t1_jbbk1vc wrote
Reply to comment by GeriatricHydralisk in When did this body type first show up? by Human1221
Amazing. I searched for Gnathostomes and found this chart showing the evolution from sharks to mammals.
Sharks have no lungs! Crocodiles are further out in the tree than mammals. I want to subscribe to your newsletter.
[deleted] t1_jbbj8ow wrote
[deleted] t1_jbbiznr wrote
Reply to comment by _Warp_Rider in How much influence does a natural satellite (like the Moon) have on the formation of continents ? by Aubin_kun
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbbfkkf wrote
[deleted] t1_jbbf6qc wrote
pistolpete0406 t1_jbbf63s wrote
Reply to comment by ParatusLetum in During the last ice age, how long would it have taken for the ice sheets to form? by CDNEmpire
Yea but they also melted within a damn decade . Greenland icecore samples for reference . Alot of craziness was occuring . I get it though . Little lag and than above freezing they disappear .
[deleted] t1_jbbexfo wrote
Reply to comment by Astrokiwi in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
[removed]
Liberty-Justice-4all t1_jbbdq3c wrote
I know why they crack at all, but I'm actually surprised that almost boiling water doesn't cracked them best.
The cracking is due to the fact that almost everything expands as it gets warmer, and if one part expands (or shrinks) more than other parts the stress forces can cause the connecting areas to snap and disconnect.
You get the same effect and can shatter glasses and mugs by very rapidly cooling or heating them (think hot tea in a cold glass, or ice cold drinks in a glass from a hot dishwasher).
My best guess on it NOT cracking in super hot water would be that it melts the surface quicker than the layer of warmed (but still frozen) ice can get thick enough to have enough stress built up to shatter free.
It's also possible the latent heat absorbed by melting off that surface is acting to cool the transition a bit, so the faster it melts the (effectively) better the cube is insulated, as sort of an ablative thermal stress guard, but I would expect that effect to be swallowed up by the vastly greater thermal difference without much notice.
[deleted] t1_jbbdkeh wrote
Reply to comment by _Warp_Rider in How much influence does a natural satellite (like the Moon) have on the formation of continents ? by Aubin_kun
[removed]
drhunny t1_jbbc5d2 wrote
Reply to comment by marcusregulus in How do plutonium based atom bombs work? What chemical reactions happen that make them explode? by L0RD_E
That's mostly correct. You can't breed Pu-239 without also breeding a little Pu-240, and you basically can't get it out of the Pu-239. Pu-240 has a very high spontaneous fission rate (atoms occasionally just fall apart, often releasing a neutron or two). At the levels present in a few kilograms of Pu, there's a random neutron every microsecond or so.
For a gun-type design, it spends a fraction of a millisecond in a configuration where a chain reaction is possible but generates a dud. And the Pu-240 spontaneous fission makes it very likely that such a dud chain reaction will happen.
[deleted] t1_jbbbo9v wrote
[removed]
Mr__Teal t1_jbb7wvi wrote
Reply to comment by extropia in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
It's 83km, you could walk that in a day at least on Earth. Might be easier to do an easy run on the moon rather than walk, but outside needing a support crew to resupply you with air you could probably do it on the moon as well.
[deleted] t1_jbb6v3d wrote
Reply to comment by Astrokiwi in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_jbb6hxq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbb14dy wrote
Reply to comment by KnoWanUKnow2 in How much influence does a natural satellite (like the Moon) have on the formation of continents ? by Aubin_kun
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbayguj wrote
marcusregulus t1_jbay1yq wrote
Reply to comment by drhunny in How do plutonium based atom bombs work? What chemical reactions happen that make them explode? by L0RD_E
My understanding of the issue of a critical mass and nuclear fission with Plutonium is that you need Pu239. The nuclear reaction to create Pu239 also creates Pu240. Pu240, being only one mass number difference is very hard to separate from Pu239. A gun design is not fast enough to initiate a fission reaction with Pu, thus an implosion design is needed.
Basically, to generate the heat, pressure, and neutron flux to ignite a fusion reaction, takes a fission reaction first.
[deleted] t1_jbbv9z0 wrote
Reply to comment by Mr__Teal in When humans next land on the moon, will our telescopes from Earth's surface be able to photograph the rocket on the moon's surface? by Nswl
[removed]