Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_jbyk7ai wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_jby60en wrote
Tus3 t1_jby2atr wrote
Reply to comment by Leni_licious in Is there a fertile creature with an odd number of chromosomes? by TheBloxyBloxGuy
Or virgin births. There exist all-female lizard species whose children are clones of their mothers. Like these ones: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Mexico_whiptail
mfb- t1_jby09vc wrote
Reply to comment by not_natty in Is Radioactivity Inversely Proportional to Half Life? by not_natty
Could be similar to pharmacokinetics but I'm not familiar with the use of saturation there. You get this effect whenever you have an (almost) constant production and a decay that's proportional to the concentration. If we look at something like a month then Y-90 production is almost constant because Sr-90 decays slowly over decades. Y-90 decays are proportional to the amount of Y-90, so you start with almost nothing and approach an equilibrium within a few times the half life (~1 week).
If you start with a pure Sr-90 sample then its overall activity will double in that time frame, yes.
CocktailChemist t1_jby03y8 wrote
Reply to comment by mesouschrist in Why is water used as coolant since it is a poor conductor of heat? by Red_Panagiotis
Can’t say I’ve ever seen that for an NMR. A standard 400 MHz instrument has to be topped up with 70-100 L of liquid helium every 6-12 months.
not_natty OP t1_jbxy8gs wrote
Reply to comment by mfb- in Is Radioactivity Inversely Proportional to Half Life? by not_natty
Is this Y-90 accumulation where you get one Y-90 decay per Sr-90 decay similar to saturation in pharmacokinetics where at 5 half-lives the levels are 'stable'?
Assuming Sr-90 and Y-90 are pure beta emitters, does this mean that if I start with pure Sr-90 at x Bqs, given some time I'll actually end up with more radioactivity in the system, as in the combined Bqs of Sr-90 and Y-90 will be greater than the initial radioactivity of pure Sr-90?
mmoarpgfps t1_jbxxoqq wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
I know the dates. Oct 2016 to june 2018. But it was a brief pilot experience, also PPL not CPL. Thats why i say at soempoint it wasnt that special.
Joint_Sufferage t1_jbxvihs wrote
Reply to comment by Tropenpinguin in Why are Y chromosomes shorter than the X chromosome? by Which-Community-5851
I can't find this lady, what university does she work for?
[deleted] t1_jbxsni4 wrote
Reply to comment by chihuahuazord in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbxsay8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbxmp67 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbxm2iv wrote
[deleted] t1_jbxkuny wrote
[deleted] t1_jbxhl8q wrote
Reply to comment by nanowell in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
[removed]
Half4sleep t1_jbwzja5 wrote
Reply to comment by ahufflepuffhobbit in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
Now, I don't know too much about this myself, but jumping to a collusion about the correlation is dangerous.
People who eat a lot of cheese are more prone to heart attacks, does that mean cheese causes it? No, overweight people just eat more of it, and because they're fat they have an increased risk of heart diseases.
Major_t0Ad t1_jbwx7av wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_Vesuvius in I just learned that the known shortest DNA in an “organism” is about 1700 base pairs in a certain virus. Is there a minimum amount of “code” required for an organism (or virus) to function in any capacity? by mcbergstedt
Adding to this awesome answer: ecologically speaking, the investment for offspring is much less dependent on sheer DNA mass for complex organisms than it is for bacteria. Bacteria optimize things unheard of for complex organisms, they have crazy selection pressure.
[deleted] t1_jbwsmtb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbwq2av wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
[removed]
tiespiderman t1_jbwosno wrote
Reply to What exactly is going on when a protein (or other molecule) binds with a receptor? by Eat-A-Torus
They are far far far more complicated than you would expect if you’re thinking it’s small so it’s simple. A lock is far simpler than a protein. Part of this is due to lower rigidity. Part of the proteins structure is well… structural. They need to be complicated to maintain structure.
[deleted] t1_jbwkag2 wrote
[deleted] t1_jbwhozh wrote
Reply to comment by chihuahuazord in Can long term cannabis abuse cause permanent changes to brain structure? by AlexMiles101
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbwgudr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbwgj46 wrote
Reply to comment by brothersand in What exactly is going on when a protein (or other molecule) binds with a receptor? by Eat-A-Torus
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbyko5n wrote
Reply to How and where is oxytocin stored in the hypothalamus? by Aaronlvx
[removed]