Recent comments in /f/askscience

aaeme t1_jcmk0sb wrote

That's a great explanation of the absorption but I think the other missing piece of the puzzle is why the photons that aren't absorbed must be scattered or reflected instead of passing straight through (after all, atoms and molecules are mostly empty space). We know visible light can pass through some solid matter and radio and microwaves can pass through apples.

I don't relish pointing that out because I know the answer isn't easy: I think an answer to that might be need to get into the realms of QED and particle interractions. Nevertheless, I do think any answer to why an orange is orange (not all apples are red so not a great example imo) needs to explain why orange is scattered or reflected and not just why non-orange light is absorbed.

2

CarneDelGato t1_jcmefde wrote

> Human made radiation is much more intense than [the radiation from] the sun

I assume you mean for the sake of using it as disinfectant. I was in San Juan this week and I’m reasonably sure my sun burns are not from human-sourced radiation.

13

RareBrit t1_jcmcq8x wrote

It’s something that’s known and studied in the earth sciences, particularly environmental microbiology. For example on a sandy beach that has been contaminated by raw sewage the sand that has been exposed to sunlight the longest will have a faecal bacteria count lower than that which has been exposed the shortest period of time. A properly collected and processed set of samples can therefore be used to support a prosecution.

As an aside most bacterial contamination on cleaner beaches comes from dogs, so yeah, clear up after your pooches please people.

3