Recent comments in /f/askscience

purpleoctopuppy t1_jcn4ra3 wrote

Yes definitely! That's why I mentioned different wavelength: sunlight is not an adequate replacement for a sterilising bulb.

I was just expecting it to be thousands of times stronger integrated across the UV spectrum that I was surprised, as I wasn't expecting to need to take that into account at the start!

5

docmeow t1_jcmxth0 wrote

While not really an endogenous retrovirus capable of causing disease by itself, this occurs to an extent in cats. In cats, Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) is present as both an exogenous retrovirus, and integrated into the genome several times as an endogenous retroviruses. Several strains of FeLV Subtype B occurs when the "env" region of endogenous FeLV recombines with exogenous FeLV. This "new" virus is not generally considered transmissible, but causes cancers to develop in the cat.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8387034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152252/

3

KoalaGrunt0311 t1_jcmwzus wrote

I forget the full measurements for UV-C. I want to say UV-C is between 280 nm and 200 nm. After investigating, it looks like Far C is 222 nm with filters set for safety purposes at 233 nm.

Columbia University is the originators of the Far UV C concept and studies. Here's some starting research points.

https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/new-type-ultraviolet-light-makes-indoor-air-safe-outdoors

And they have their technology licensed to USHIO.

https://www.ushio.com/product/care222-filtered-far-uv-c-excimer-lamp-module/

2