Recent comments in /f/askscience
[deleted] t1_jct5oy3 wrote
Reply to comment by Hiddencamper in Why were the control rods in the reactor featured in the HBO series 'Chernobyl' (2019) tipped with graphite? by Figorama
[removed]
GeriatricHydralisk t1_jct5ayu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
False, horses evolved in the Americas first, and precursor species as well as modern horses repeatedly migrated across the land bridge to Eurasia.
Then, about 12,000 years ago, they all died out in America, a long with all the other native Megafauna, right around the time a certain species with tools, fire, and a reputation to eating things into extinction showed up.
[deleted] t1_jct56xz wrote
Reply to comment by horsetuna in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jct54rg wrote
[deleted] t1_jct51fi wrote
[deleted] t1_jct3m4b wrote
[removed]
mesouschrist t1_jct3knw wrote
Reply to comment by fr293 in We're often taught that objects travel to lower energy states to reach stability. But the energy of the universe is constant - doesn't that just mean other surrounding things go to higher energy states? What decides which thing gets to have low energy? by SMM-123Sam
The energy of the universe is constant under the assumption that there are laws of physics that apply to the universe across all times (i.e. the motion of things in the universe can be explained without an explicit time dependence, like the gravitational constant shrinking with time without any underlying reason). Energy is the conserved quantity associated with time invariant laws of physics. So if you think energy is decreasing or increasing, you just have the wrong definition of energy (like when a ball rolling across the table slows down, it's lost energy, but really the energy has gone somewhere else).
It doesn't matter whether or not the system is relativistic - certainly energy is still conserved in special and general relativity. But I'd be curious if you could elaborate on what you were thinking there.
[deleted] t1_jct3kcq wrote
Reply to comment by plinythebitchy in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jct2767 wrote
Reply to Why that walking with the arms moving is easier than walking with them still? by BossBo161812
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jct10hu wrote
[deleted] t1_jcswfyy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in what effects do dehydration and tiredness have on our perceived hearing? by dombeale
[removed]
OryuSatellite OP t1_jcstesv wrote
Reply to comment by Apollo506 in How does immunity to larger internal parasites such as worms work? by OryuSatellite
Thank you, that's great! Checking out the paper now.
ETA wow that is the exact perfect paper, thanks again!
[deleted] t1_jcsrpmm wrote
[deleted] t1_jcsrmpq wrote
[deleted] t1_jcsqnge wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jcsqcfe wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jcsq4yp wrote
Reply to comment by plinythebitchy in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
[removed]
nicknoxx t1_jcspmj7 wrote
Reply to comment by You_Stole_My_Hot_Dog in Why have many plants evolved to need nitrogen-rich soil, when there is so much nitrogen freely available in they air they use anyway? by runningchild
Nitrogen fixing plants can use gaseous nitrogen and deposit it in the soil.
[deleted] t1_jcsp5d6 wrote
Reply to comment by plinythebitchy in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
[removed]
plinythebitchy t1_jcsnqsq wrote
Reply to comment by horsetuna in How different were the first horses domesticated by humans compared to modern horses? by clacker96
Could you link the one on evolution in the Americas, too?
[deleted] t1_jcsjliy wrote
[deleted] t1_jcsgb7t wrote
[removed]
mfb- t1_jcsg4pp wrote
Reply to comment by spiteful_rr_dm_TA in What is the ultimate fate of rocky bodies? by spiteful_rr_dm_TA
It's hard to imagine a scenario where protons are absolutely stable. If there is no other process then gravity should be able to make them decay via virtual black holes. But assuming they are absolutely stable you expect the nuclei fuse/split to form iron and nickel over time and stay like that forever.
[deleted] t1_jct64el wrote
Reply to Why have many plants evolved to need nitrogen-rich soil, when there is so much nitrogen freely available in they air they use anyway? by runningchild
[removed]