Recent comments in /f/askscience

hal2k1 t1_jdum41b wrote

How Fast Can a Kangaroo Run?

In terms of covering ground kangaroos have some impressive statistics. Interestingly kangaroos don't run, they jump. Kangaroos are recognized in the jumping category as the best jumpers in the world. They can spend more than 30 minutes jumping as they have excellent resistance and know how to manage their energy well.

4

CluebatOfSmiting t1_jdul5zk wrote

Small electric aircraft already exist. Given the interest in electric aviation by many big name companies including Tesla, the constantly improving battery tech, and the way the companies talking about alt fuels are either still in development or actively dragging their feet in hope that people give up and let them keep making gas cars, we may well end up going all electric before alternate aviation fuels are available...

−18

janoc t1_jdujoxy wrote

It is both regulation (anything aviation takes ages to get certified - both fuel and engines using it must be certified to be legal to use) and also the old engines which simply can't run on unleaded gas.

It is not a question of octane number so much but engine lubrication, fouling and knocking. Older planes with engines not designed for unleaded gas would require additives for this reason - the same as old cars do when fueled with unleaded gas.

Aviation is a slow moving field - not many people still drive cars made in the 60-70s but there are many many planes that are even older than that still in service (esp. with private owners, flight schools, etc.) - and none of them can handle unleaded fuel without additional steps. Either using fuel premixed with an additive (the most common solution) or an expensive engine modification which may not even be available for the old engine types still in use.

Oh and the unleaded avgas is more expensive than regular one too. Given that the price of fuel is one of the largest costs when flying, it is likely not going to help its popularity either.

11

ReadAllAboutIt92 t1_jdujmwq wrote

There is also a promising push within the industry that new build aircraft are fitted with engines that run on alternative fuels. Rotax engines that run on MOGAS (or standard car-grade gasoline/petrol) are becoming more popular. Diamond Aircraft from Austria fit the majority of their aircraft with a modified Mercedes Benz Diesel engine, which has its own issues, but removes the Lead content.

The issue in General Aviation is that these piston aircraft, with the right levels of maintenance, can run for decades, the majority of aircraft that students train in these days are 40-60 years old, still completely safe, and still completely legal, but running on technology that would otherwise be completely obsolete. However these engines keep going because they have the safety record to back them up, and rule number 1 of flying is to reduce risk and maximise safety at every opportunity.

88

redligand t1_jdugsha wrote

I think the question is based on a misapprehension. Kuru and Mad Cow Disease are not caused by cannibalism. This seems to be quite a common belief and is a misunderstanding. The cannibalised individual has to be infected in the first place. Which is relatively rare. What can be said, perhaps, is that cannibalism is possibly the only way the infection can be transmitted from individual to individual as consumption of infected tissues is pretty much the only way it can pass from person to person. However, kuru is not a fundamental risk of cannibalism in and of itself. If there isn't kuru in the population already, cannibalism itself isn't going to cause it to emerge.

I think the myth came from a group of people who engaged in ritualistic cannibalism of their dead. They had kuru in the population already from eating infected ungulates and people were dying of kuru and then being eaten due to the traditional practices, which just passed the problem on. But the cannibalism wasn't the source of the condition, just the means of transfer.

42

pavlik_enemy t1_jdugpas wrote

Why do we even use avgas with aviation piston engines being what they are today i.e. not particularly advanced? Is it regulations, so engine certified for 100LL couldn't be easily switched to a fuel with less octane number?

But with avgas being just 0.14% of all fuel consumption in US I guess it's not a national issue though people living near small airports could be concerned.

90

MrRoundtree17 t1_jdugj8e wrote

Not really an answer to your question, but a fun fact. In order to stand upright, human legs have to connect directly downward from the pelvis. This means the opening which baby’s pass through during childbirth is smaller than in 4-legged animals where the legs connect at an angle to the pelvis. In order to fit the baby through the narrower passage, we evolved to give birth earlier when the baby is smaller. See, most mammals have a similar gestation period relevant to their life span. The human gestation period should be around 14 months. So that’s why newborn babies are such helpless potatoes when they’re born at 9 months.

Edit: I kept saying tailbone when I meant pelvis.

40