Recent comments in /f/askscience

HarryHacker42 t1_jdvl5c5 wrote

Near car freeways, lead in the soil within a 500 feet has higher lead content than soil 1000 feet away. So, cars of the 1920s through 1970s burned leaded gas and left deposits that exist today. I'd bet the same is true of airports with the lead being more concentrated on the areas the planes take off over, as that is when they're burning a lot of fuel.

1

reality_boy t1_jdvjm6d wrote

Yes, your ears can’t hear quieter sounds that are near the frequency of a loud sound. And some frequencies cancel out higher frequency sounds as well. This is the reason that lossy audio compression works. You can throw away all noise outside of you ability to hear. It is a significant amount of data that can be tossed.

In addition audio is collected at a certain bit rate (8 bit, 16 but, 32 bit, 96 bit). As well as at a certain sample rate (44khz, etc). Modern audio cards can sample audio well above your ears ability to distinguish the individual changes or frequencies.

We often use this to our advantage when capturing audio. For example capturing at 96 bits is similar to modern HDR cameras in that you can capture both the quietest and loudest sounds we can detect, at the same time, even if both together would never be in the same final mix. This lets us set and forget our mic gains without worrying about blowing out the sound.

68

MAS2de t1_jdvix3r wrote

Car fires happen, so do plane fires. They also have batteries that you can put a bunch of nails through and all that happens is they lose a small amount of capacity. Those batteries are on the market today. Not in mass quantities. But to think that a future battery couldn't hold far more capacity than today's batteries and be safe and have enough other good parameters for aviation is silly.

−2