Submitted by Left-Indication t3_zi0wf0 in baltimore
todareistobmore t1_izpv0el wrote
Reply to comment by instantcoffee69 in Baltimore rail transit lines vs. population density by Left-Indication
> Let's not forget: light rail was meant for people from the suburbs to get into the city and back out. Not for intra-city travel.
Not really, it was just made for a few specific uses (stadiums, State Center, BWI) rather than general reliance, same as the subway.
jdl12358 t1_izq0yqy wrote
Correct me if I’m wrong but it was also sort of pitched as a way to resurrect the west side of downtown/Howard Street corridor. Obviously not gonna work if there’s no plan and not much else on the corridor.
gothaggis t1_izqvos8 wrote
yes that is correct. Some people will try to say that the light rail killed howard street - but really (from what I understand) it was already in decline - they were hoping the light rail would save it.
baltimorecalling t1_izt627k wrote
Howard Street was DOA by the time the Light Rail began running.
Jrbobfishman t1_izzykul wrote
So untrue. Yes, Howard street had suffered much decay from its heyday but it was far from dead
 Baltimore rail transit lines vs. population density
Baltimore rail transit lines vs. population density
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments