Recent comments in /f/baltimore
Nickmeria t1_j47rjzb wrote
Reply to Best Place for Fries by IamAcapacitor
My favorite are the Old Bay fries in LP Steamers
S-Kunst t1_j47q7js wrote
Reply to comment by No-Lunch4249 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Right. There is no reason why the light rail is not given right-of-way many times. Oliver St & Mt Royal. The car traffic light is fully out of sync with the light rail. which makes both the car and the train sit there both waiting for the light to turn green. At that location the light rail is at right angle to Mt Royal. Also there are never ending shut-downs for parts of the system. I used to take light rail to Woodberry for work, but only when it snowed. 50% of the time there was a shut down and I had to walk from North Ave to Mt. V. Not very useful as a commuter line.
[deleted] t1_j47pse4 wrote
Reply to comment by moderndukes in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
[deleted]
sllewgh t1_j47n7o4 wrote
Reply to comment by gaiusjuliusweezer in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
> I am just trying to counter the narrative that light rail means some big ugly train is barreling down on your neighborhood and making it an unpleasant place.
My mom used to live 200ft from a light rail track, and you'd hardly notice it coming by if you weren't looking out the window. They're barely louder than low level automotive traffic.
megalomike t1_j47m01e wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_Midnight in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
i think that would be great, and it seems like doing a pilot where they just stop letting traffic on howard would be fairly straightforward.
Dr_Midnight t1_j47kuss wrote
Reply to comment by megalomike in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
> the howard street stretch connects those two chunks, and could be a lot nicer.
One possibility: Howard Street should be closed to North/South vehicular traffic between MLK and Pratt Street - allowing only light rail and pedestrian traffic. Allow the existing East/West traffic to persist, and convert the now no longer needed for vehicular traffic area to green space.
Just a thought for consideration.
laurmich13 t1_j47krhd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Best Place for Fries by IamAcapacitor
brewers art >>>
bmore t1_j47juik wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainObvious110 in Did you know there are discounted plans for riding scooters? by BmoreCityDOT
The apps here require the photos too.
bmore t1_j47jljf wrote
Reply to comment by moderndukes in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
No they were new.
Somali_Pir8 t1_j47ihm3 wrote
Reply to A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Has there been discussion about building in-fill stations? Like at TopGolf/Horseshoe Casino or UMMC Midtown Hospital.
CaptainObvious110 t1_j47i70y wrote
Reply to comment by BmoreCityDOT in Did you know there are discounted plans for riding scooters? by BmoreCityDOT
Oh I'm aware of it. I'm not speaking on the future I am speaking on what's going on right now.
The scooters have been around for several years now so there has already been plenty of time to analyze results and take action on it.
offairashley t1_j47f4yg wrote
Reply to comment by gofasterstripes in Nathan Sterner WYPR by [deleted]
Yep! Offair (as per my handle) and now onair too!
[deleted] t1_j47ex6d wrote
Reply to Best Place for Fries by IamAcapacitor
[removed]
Go4it296 t1_j47eun3 wrote
Reply to comment by yeehawdudeq in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Yeah this reminds me a bit of the ones that go through the main strip in Munich too
gofasterstripes t1_j47etai wrote
Reply to comment by offairashley in Nathan Sterner WYPR by [deleted]
Wait, is this ACTUALLY ASHLEY STERNER???
offairashley t1_j47emtg wrote
Reply to comment by gofasterstripes in Nathan Sterner WYPR by [deleted]
This is so good I almost said it in my sign-off this week!
Cheomesh t1_j47cvpv wrote
Reply to comment by moderndukes in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
>I took the Light Rail the other day from Camden to Timonium
Whenever I'm in town I'm usually taking it the opposite direction and I'm inclined to agree with you on the experience being positive (and on service expansion if that was possible).
gaiusjuliusweezer OP t1_j47azsu wrote
Reply to comment by moderndukes in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Yeah, people do forget that our light rail’s average speed is very high overall
gaiusjuliusweezer OP t1_j47ajhx wrote
Reply to comment by DfcukinLite in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Probably Guilford/Homeland that are along York
Cat_Toucher t1_j47aj0s wrote
Reply to comment by ThatguyfromBaltimore in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Every time I look at the old street car map and think about what we could have had I want to scream. Of course, I also get the same feeling when I see those goofy, “I made a subway stop everywhere there is a Subway restaurant location” maps too. I won’t say anything would be better than what we have now, but, uh. It’s close.
gaiusjuliusweezer OP t1_j47a976 wrote
Reply to comment by Gitopia in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
The thing is, it helps to be near pedestrians
yeehawdudeq t1_j479poy wrote
Reply to comment by AttisofAssyria in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
It’s integrated so well into cities elsewhere. I’m tired of the concrete jungle we’ve created here
Gitopia t1_j478q5t wrote
Reply to comment by moderndukes in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Old town mall would beg to differ.
Edit: although, OTM doesn't have light rail so maybe it could work.
Gitopia t1_j478ixd wrote
Reply to comment by biffbagwell in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
it's probably definitely not factual, but it feels like the only place on earth where the trains have to stop and wait for cars that isn't a full on streetcar wtf.
rental_car_fast t1_j47rtqh wrote
Reply to comment by No-Lunch4249 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
It also doesn't really go anywhere special. I find it convenient sometimes, and use it when I can, but it just follows 83 so there's no real motivation to use it unless you're going to some place like the stadiums where parking is a challenge.
I wish it was a network, and I wish it made it easier to get places I hate driving, like Columbia.