Recent comments in /f/baltimore
Ok-Library247 t1_j48l1ab wrote
Ekiben
physicallyatherapist t1_j48jzcg wrote
Reply to comment by Cat_Toucher in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
There was a time when they would come every 4-5 minutes. It makes me so sad to think what could have been
Xanny t1_j48i753 wrote
Reply to comment by gaiusjuliusweezer in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Its definite a bit.. annoying that I never just "go out" since its so risky in this city to just walk around sometimes and places.
[deleted] t1_j48gd75 wrote
Reply to comment by drunklepockets in What does eviction prevention accomplish. by LongjumpingShot
[deleted]
In_This_To_Win_This OP t1_j48gbjv wrote
Reply to comment by Ritaontherocksnosalt in Is part of the walking loop at Lake Montebello still closed? by In_This_To_Win_This
Oh no. Walking that trail is a favorite activity of mine and the whole family. I do wish there were emergency phones are something of that nature along the trail. I’ve walked thru some parts on the other side of Belair Road towards Harford and saw some unscrupulous men that made me immediately turn around. Here’s hoping that the city is aware of the “flooding” areas too.
gothaggis t1_j48fpfo wrote
Reply to comment by jabbadarth in Best Place for Fries by IamAcapacitor
funny story - I went there with some friends when they first opened (we used to frequent Harbor Inn, which is what it was before Annabelle Lee) - we sat at the bar and got food (burgers I think..and the duck fat fries). When we paid the tab, a friend noticed on the bill it said "fuck fat fries" - we showed the owner and had a good laugh about it. I guess a typo caused it.....but anyway, for years we always called them fuck fat fries after that....I stopped by last week for the first time in years and had to hold my tongue to order "fuck fat fries"
drunklepockets t1_j48cywo wrote
Reply to comment by LongjumpingShot in What does eviction prevention accomplish. by LongjumpingShot
Housing should be like plates a dinner, no one gets second’s until everyone has gotten their first plate. I don’t think small time landlords are the biggest problem in the world, obviously huge banks and hedge funds, companies like Zillow buying up huge amounts of properties and keeping a lot empty to drive prices up are the real problem. That being said, stealing $100 and stealing 10 million are both stealing. We know which one is worse. I’m not attacking you. I’m just pointing out that the system set in place (that you are benefiting from) is unethical.
AndChewBubblegum t1_j48cjzx wrote
Reply to comment by ASK_ME_AB0UT_L00M in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Same for a lot of the lines in Boston.
drunklepockets t1_j48ce2l wrote
Reply to comment by LongjumpingShot in What does eviction prevention accomplish. by LongjumpingShot
So you own a house you don’t live in and rent one you don’t own. In a better world wouldn’t you just own the house you live in?
ASK_ME_AB0UT_L00M t1_j48b41f wrote
Reply to comment by Gitopia in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
I'm visiting Melbourne, Australia right now, and the trams (light rail) all interact with traffic in some way, including stopping at red lights and sometimes waiting for cars.
RealName1234567890 t1_j48acqu wrote
Reply to comment by Matt3989 in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
💯 this
I take the subway whenever it makes even a little sense to use it (which, luckily, is anytime I’m going to work). Of all the ways I’ve tried to get around the city, it has consistently been the least annoying and lowest stress way of doing it.
It sucks that putting transit underground is so damned expensive to build, because it makes a huge difference in functionality. (I’d probably even be fine with BRT if it was tunneled the whole way.)
gaiusjuliusweezer OP t1_j488t7a wrote
Reply to comment by Xanny in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
This has also been an obstacle, but it’s changing. Question is…do they ever come out of those apartments? How does it translate into street life?
Because the answer so far is: not much yet
LongjumpingShot OP t1_j488gxj wrote
Reply to comment by Interesting_Loan_425 in What does eviction prevention accomplish. by LongjumpingShot
I already signed a lease because my job moves. I lived there before though. I’m not a property manager, I have a real job if that’s what you call what I do for a living lol.
LongjumpingShot OP t1_j487i5y wrote
Reply to comment by drunklepockets in What does eviction prevention accomplish. by LongjumpingShot
That’s not true, I think rent to own is something valuable. It give those time to build credit where they would otherwise be homeless. I don’t think people who can’t qualify for home loans deserve to be homeless. Sometimes tenants just need time to build credit or need to test an area to know if they want to make a 30 year investment in an area. It’s kind of elitist to think renters don’t deserve housing.
I rent because it’s near my job. To deny me housing near my job because I’m not sure where my next job will be is unfair to those who rely on a paycheck and actually work.
Maybe in a few years, I’ll by but I shouldn’t be denied housing because I’m not ready for ownership in the area.
Ritaontherocksnosalt t1_j486sl5 wrote
Where the park entrance is off Harford there is a basketball court and large grassy area parallel to the road. That entire area is wet all the time. I think the Run is expanding or the underground tributaries feeding the Run are. I’ve seen other large wet areas as I walk my dog in some of the fields. The whole park needs to be evaluated. Right now there is only 1 way for handicapped, small children or older people to get in the park. The neighborhood trail entrances are not maintained and not what I would consider safe for a casual walk.
Cunninghams_right t1_j4867g8 wrote
Reply to A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
the priority of things for our light rail is:
- frequency and reliability. 15min headway is too long for anyone to take it seriously as a mode of transit. it becomes "transit of last resort" when the wait is that long. this is made even worse by the low reliability. I've waited 10min for a train that the sign said was getting closer... then nothing. take out phone, see that the light rail is fucked up today (with no indication at the station), and just call an Uber because now I don't have time to go take the bus. it's stupid. now, I bike or scooter everywhere within the city and either drive or Uber if I'm going outside the city or to the airport.
- comfort and cleanliness. if people feel like it's sketchy/unsafe or dirty, they will be less inclined to use it. this shows in transit survey after transit survey throughout the US, but transit agencies struggle to do anything about it, as it would basically require a security guard on every train, which isn't in the budget.
- good first/last mile connections. MTA is really bad at getting people to/from the light rail. buses are unreliable and infrequent, and they refuse to subsidize rental bikes/scooters.
I think we should be keeping an eye on Siemens' driverless trams. if we can remove the requirement for a driver, we can run them more frequently AND put security on the trains/trams. not sure if we can really do much about the track maintenance problems that frequently put it out of service. we can separate the RoW a bit more and install gates across the roadway to reduce the collisions with cars, which could help a bit.
that said, I really think it is a mistake for the US to build surface level transit. our politicians don't have the backbone to give it true priority over cars like is needed to make it frequent and fast, so it will always suck.
also, if I recall correctly, our metro and our light rail have the same track gauge. we should turn both the light rail and our metro into a fully-automated tram, each with a 3min-5min headway. sharing the same rolling stock would help reduce maintenance costs and larger vehicle orders generally get a much better deal from the manufacturers
Xanny t1_j4862zb wrote
Reply to comment by Broad-Brush in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
There is a CSX tunnel from Camden to Penn, it follows the exact same alignment as the light rail. Nothing ever stopped MTA from using the portal entrances on either end CSX already has, widening them, and connecting the light rail to the subway tunnel.
If they buried the damn thing it would be a night and day difference and improvement.
Xanny t1_j484iul wrote
Reply to comment by gaiusjuliusweezer in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Nobody really lives downtown, though.
BmoreCityDOT OP t1_j47zufn wrote
fijimermaidsg t1_j47y7tt wrote
Reply to Best Place for Fries by IamAcapacitor
The Tilted Row on Eutaw/Bolton Hill has a special duck poutine on their winter menu and they have a bar as well.
Broad-Brush t1_j47x6m3 wrote
Reply to A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
They really should scrap the current light rail between Penn Station and Camden Station while building an extensive street based light rails system like this.
memeticengineering t1_j47tsn8 wrote
Reply to comment by rental_car_fast in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
It's nice I don't have to take a car to the airport every time, but that's about it.
BmoreCityDOT OP t1_j47sear wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_Midnight in Did you know there are discounted plans for riding scooters? by BmoreCityDOT
Bah! Thank you. We use Buffly for tracking, didn’t realize that was banned too. All updated.
Dr_Midnight t1_j47s89k wrote
Reply to comment by BmoreCityDOT in Did you know there are discounted plans for riding scooters? by BmoreCityDOT
As a heads up, all links containing URLs that match to short link providers (such as buff.ly) are removed automatically by Reddit as a spam and malicious-link prevention methodology. We have no control over this behavior. Please avoid the usage of such and link directly to the long-form URL in question.
gaiusjuliusweezer OP t1_j48l406 wrote
Reply to comment by Xanny in A reminder that "light rail" (as a concept) and "The Light Rail" (that we have) are not synonymous by gaiusjuliusweezer
Now, you do have large populations of people who walk to shit and can be engaged in basically l every single direction.
Unfortunately Councilman Eric Costello seems to haphazardly step all over every effort to connect to them whenever bike/scooter/ped infrastructure comes up.
Which is silly! It’s his district he’s hurting in favor of Cohen’s, which doesn’t have those high volume traffic sewers like Pratt/Lombard, Paca, MLK, etc. that repel pedestrians